ArticlePloS one2026
Analysis of the importance and priority of male and female players in mixed doubles table tennis.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To examine the relative importance and tactical priorities of male and female players in mixed doubles table tennis, this study analysed 35 matches involving world top-50 ranked players. A novel Five-Phase and Four-Mode Model was eveloped and applied. Performance was then evaluated using multiple regression and total decision coefficient method. The results indicate that: (1) Compared to conventional methods, the proposed model demonstrates superior alignment with mixed doubles characteristics in three key dimensions: phase segmentation, assessment indicators, and data acquisition protocols. This methodological advancement significantly enhances the characterization of doubles-specific technical and tactical patterns. (2) Male players demonstrated a higher performance impact (1.3 times that of female players), which is consistent with empirically observed "male-dominant, female-supportive" dynamic in mixed doubles. (3) The "lady-first" strategy is confirmed as an effective match arrangement principle: during service round, the female player should serve first; in receiving scenarios, regardless of the server's identity, the female player should be the primary receiver.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.