ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Interventions to support parents, families and caregivers in caring for preterm or low birth weight infants at home: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine what interventions, approaches, or strategies to support mothers/fathers/caregivers and families in caring for preterm (<37 gestational weeks) or low birthweight (<2,500g) infants in the home have been effective in improving outcomes. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of relevant electronic databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was completed in September 2024. Studies were included if they utilised interventions which focused on providing support to participants (mother/father/parents, families or caregivers) to care for their infants in the home. Two reviewers independently screened papers in Covidence and extracted data. Random effects meta-analyses were undertaken. Quality of studies and certainty of evidence were assessed using CASP and GRADE, respectively. Critical outcomes based on WHO preterm and low birthweight criteria comprised infant mortality, morbidity, growth and neurodevelopment. Priority outcomes comprised breastfeeding, care seeking, parent-infant interaction, mother-child attachment and parental health and wellbeing. Forty-seven studies were included. There is some evidence that support interventions may improve outcomes related to infant mortality, improvements in infant growth, exclusive breastfeeding, infant cognitive development, immunisation uptake, and reduction in maternal stress and depression. However, the overall certainty of evidence is low or very low in the majority of studies. We conclude that interventions providing support for parents to care for infants in the home may improve outcomes for this population. There is a need for well-considered large scale support interventions, prioritised and developed with women and families.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.