ArticleAmerican journal of speech-language pathology2026
Variable Speech Cueing Effects in Talkers With Parkinson's Disease.
Article in American journal of speech-language pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study sought to determine the variable effect of three cueing strategies (i.e., loud, clear, or slow speech) on speech intelligibility and perceived speech severity in talkers with dysarthria due to Parkinson's disease (PD). The study also aimed to identify perceptual speech features associated with responses to these speech cues.
methodEighty-four naive listeners rated speech samples of 52 talkers with PD. Each talker's samples consisted of two sentences produced in habitual, loud, clear, and slow speech. Listeners rated intelligibility and speech severity as perceptual outcome measures using separate visual analog scales. The relative change in intelligibility and speech severity ratings from habitual speech to each speech cue was calculated. Based on the threshold of a meaningful change, talkers were grouped into "positive responders" and "nonpositive responders" for each outcome measure and each speech cue. Finally, a profile of perceptual speech features and severity ratings of the articulatory and phonatory subsystem impairment was established for each talker based on their habitual speech to identify potential predictors of the cueing response patterns.
resultsFor both outcome measures, intelligibility and speech severity, loud speech elicited the most positive responses followed by clear speech and slow speech. Subsystem impairment severity differed between positive responders and non-positive responders. For each cueing strategy, the presence of specific perceptual speech features indicated a likelihood of a positive response.
conclusionFindings provide an important stepping stone for future research that seeks to advance personalized treatment of dysarthria in talkers with PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.