Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41665835›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Avoidance of capture by motion onset.

Jahnavi Nair, Xiaojin Ma, Richard A Abrams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jahnavi NairDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Xiaojin MaDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA. xiaojinma@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4592-6408
Richard A AbramsDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent research has shown that salient items can sometimes be suppressed or ignored during visual search. The findings may help resolve apparently contradictory findings in the attention literature. Suppression of salient items, however, has been shown almost exclusively for color singletons, despite the fact that many other visual attributes can also render an item to be salient. We show here, for the first time, that attentional capture by motion onset can also be prevented. In Experiment 1, using an additional singleton task in which suppression is not expected, we confirmed that irrelevant motion onsets are salient and can impair visual search performance. In Experiment 2, we included motion-onset distractors in the search for a prespecified shape. In that task the motion-onset distractor had no effect on performance, indicating that attentional capture by it had been avoided. Finally, in Experiment 3, we replicated the results from Experiment 2 and additionally included probe trials that also revealed avoidance of motion-onset capture. The findings help to generalize and provide support for theories of attentional suppression and avoidance of capture by salient stimuli.

Indexed as

AttentionColor PerceptionInhibition, PsychologicalMotion PerceptionPattern Recognition, VisualAdultFemaleHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung AdultAttentional captureInhibitionMotion onsetVisual attentionVisual search

Identifiers

PMID41665835
PMCPMC12891046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.