ReviewTargeted oncology2026
Evidence for the Monitoring of Minimal Residual Disease Dynamics to Guide Clinical Practice in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.
Review in Targeted oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- From static risk to dynamic disease monitoring: the role of MRD and immune profiling in multiple myeloma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The Role of Genomics in the Development and Treatment of Multiple Myeloma: Understanding the Challenges and Opportunities.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogeneous cancer that remains incurable. After treatment, the presence of residual myeloma clonal cells, or minimal residual disease (MRD), leads to tumor recurrence (relapse) and treatment failure (refractory disease). Strong clinical evidence indicates MRD is a surrogate marker of survival in patients with MM and is of important prognostic value in disease management. MRD status is dynamic and longitudinal changes in MRD status have different clinical implications. For example, sustained MRD negativity (undetectable MRD) has been associated with greatly improved survival outcomes, whereas the loss of MRD negativity is associated with disease progression. Although research on the prognostic impact of MRD dynamics in real world clinical practice is ongoing, several major concerns remain to be addressed before implementing the monitoring of MRD dynamics and MRD-guided therapeutic decision making in everyday clinical practice in the management of MM. In this review, we discuss the prognostic and clinical value of MRD dynamics, the evidence from literature for MRD-guided clinical decision making, and the challenges around implementing monitoring of MRD dynamics into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.