Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41665797›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026

Strategies for Identifying Core Components of Programs: an Exploratory Descriptive Component Case Study of a Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program.

Russell Cole, Jean Knab, Emily Forrester

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Russell ColeMathematica Inc., 600 Alexander Park, Suite 100, Princeton, NJ, USA. rcole@mathematica-mpr.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7633-5921
Jean KnabMathematica Inc., 600 Alexander Park, Suite 100, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Emily ForresterMathematica Inc., 600 Alexander Park, Suite 100, Princeton, NJ, USA.

Funding

Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion HHSP233201500035I/75P00122F37068Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health HHSP233201500035I/75P00120F37051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of program components (i.e., the ingredients that make up programs) have risen from obscurity to join mainstream program evaluation approaches over the last two decades. Researchers and policymakers are interested in leveraging information about the effectiveness of program components to better address the needs of programs' intended populations and reduce disparities in outcomes. Identifying which components are responsible for improving outcomes can inform evaluation design, measurement, and the state of the evidence as well as program development, adaptation, fidelity, and scale-up. This paper summarizes strategies for conducting components research, and anchors those emerging best practices in a components case study of a teen pregnancy prevention program. It offers applied guidance on ways to define and operationalize components, and best practices in measurement and analysis that have emerged from this work. This paper will help guide the prevention field toward conducting more and better research that yields consensus about which components are most important for program effectiveness.

Indexed as

Pregnancy in AdolescenceProgram EvaluationAdolescentFemaleHumansPregnancyAnalysisCase studyImplementationMeasurementOutcomesProgram componentsProspective studyRetrospective study

Identifiers

PMID41665797
PMCPMC12999639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.