ArticleClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2026
Setting up an autonomic unit within the neurological department: a position statement of the European Federation of Autonomic Societies.
Article in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe growing recognition of autonomic nervous system (ANS) dysfunction across a broad spectrum of neurological and systemic diseases calls for structured, multidisciplinary care. This position statement by the European Federation of Autonomic Societies aims to provide guidance on establishing an autonomic unit within a neurology department.
methodsA Task Force appointed by the European Federation of Autonomic Societies board in October 2022 proposed staffing and equipment requirements for autonomic units, based on a literature review, survey data from ANS laboratories, and existing diagnostic guidelines. These propositions were integrated into the initial 25 questions and refined using a modified Delphi method to achieve expert consensus. Consensus was predefined as ≥ 80% agreement. Statements that did not reach consensus were revised and reassessed in subsequent rounds.
resultsAfter three rounds of Delphi surveys, expert consensus was achieved on the minimal and optimal requirements for autonomic unit personnel, technical equipment, and the availability of multidisciplinary care.
conclusionThis European Federation of Autonomic Societies position statement presents practical, expert-based recommendations to promote the development of autonomic units across various healthcare systems. By establishing minimum and optimal standards for staffing, equipment, and interdisciplinary collaboration, the document offers a clear framework for standardizing clinical care and supporting collaborative research. This statement serves as a foundational resource for clinicians, administrators, and policymakers committed to strengthening the ANS care infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.