ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026
Effectiveness of Moringa oleifera, chitosan, and alum as adsorbents in lake water treatment.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of Moringa oleifera (MO), chitosan, and alum as adsorbents on the physicochemical properties of water collected from Lake Florida in Johannesburg, South Africa. The lake water was subjected to three different treatments using jar tests at concentration dosages of 25, 30, and 35 mL and settling times of 30, 60, and 90 min. The water treated with adsorbents significantly reduced turbidity (p < 0.05) with removal efficiencies of 99.33% for MO (30 mL, 30 min), 99.22% for chitosan (35 mL, 60 min), and 99.60% for alum (25 mL, 60 min). Dissolved oxygen increased significantly (p < 0.05) from 2.06 ± 0.02 mg/L to 3.24 ± 0.01 mg/L with chitosan (25 mL, 90 min) and MO (35 mL, 90 min), and to 3.15 ± 0.01 mg/L with alum (25 mL, 60 min). Sulfate levels increased with MO from 65.00 ± 1.00 mg/L to 200.67 ± 0.58 mg/L (35 mL, 90 min), while alum caused an initial decrease to 49.67 ± 0.58 mg/L (25 mL, 30 min), followed by an increase to 71.33 ± 0.58 mg/L. Furthermore, total dissolved solids and conductivity increased with MO, whereas chitosan and alum caused no significant changes. However, a slight pH reduction was noted, with no significant nitrate alteration. Based on principal component analysis, the key factors driving water quality variations in the dataset were treatment type and retention time, with parameters such as pH, conductivity, and sulfate being strong indicators of treatment efficiency. Dissolved oxygen and nitrate were more dependent on treatment time. These findings provide insights into the performance of different adsorbents and their impacts on lake water quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.