ArticleCarbon balance and management2026
From capital to climate action: assessing the impact of china's green credit initiative on corporate emissions.
Article in Carbon balance and management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The transition toward low-carbon sustainable development is critical for transforming heavily polluting industries. Green credit policies are designed to direct capital toward environmentally friendly and low-carbon corporates. Using the introduction of China's Green Credit Guidelines in 2012 as a quasi-natural experiment, this study analyzes a panel of A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2021. Employing a Difference-in-Differences approach, we assess the impact of the green credit policy (GCP) on corporate carbon emissions. Empirical results indicate that GCP leads to a significant reduction in corporate carbon emissions. Baseline DID estimates show that treated corporates reduced emissions by approximately 13-19% compared to the control group, a finding that remains robust across a series of checks. The emission-reduction effect of GCP is more pronounced in corporations with a separated board leadership structure, higher profitability, central urban locations, and well-developed digital infrastructure. We identify two primary mechanisms through which GCP operates: imposing financial constraints that deter investment in carbon-intensive activities, and promoting green innovation, which facilitates the adoption of environmentally friendly technologies and practices. Further analysis reveals that both internal governance and external regulatory factors-such as stronger environmental awareness among executives, ISO 14,001 certification, enhanced intellectual property protection, and strict enforcement of the Three Simultaneous System-strengthen the effectiveness of GCP in reducing emissions. Through these channels, GCP supports the transition to a more sustainable economic pathway and contributes to global climate change mitigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.