Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41665739›Full record

ArticleCell and tissue banking2026

Impact of donor-recipient gender mismatch on outcomes in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

Zoe Eckly, Andre M Trouvain, Maria Della Volpe-Waizel, Clara E Englisch, Peter Szurman, Berthold Seitz, Fabian Fries, Annekatrin Rickmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cell and tissue banking, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Predictors of long-term graft survival after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zoe Eckly *Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, An der Klinik 10, 66280, Sulzbach, Saar, Germany.
Andre M Trouvain *Eye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, An der Klinik 10, 66280, Sulzbach, Saar, Germany. Andre.Trouvain@Knappschaft-Kliniken.de.
Maria Della Volpe-WaizelDepartment of Ophthalmology, Universitätsspital, Basel, Switzerland.
Clara E EnglischEye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, An der Klinik 10, 66280, Sulzbach, Saar, Germany.
Peter SzurmanEye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, An der Klinik 10, 66280, Sulzbach, Saar, Germany.
Berthold SeitzDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Fabian FriesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center (UKS), Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Annekatrin RickmannEye Clinic Sulzbach, Knappschaft Hospital Saar, An der Klinik 10, 66280, Sulzbach, Saar, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrevious studies have suggested that H-Y antigens may influence immunological outcomes in corneal transplantation. This study analyses the influence of donor-recipient gender mismatch in DMEK on postoperative outcomes.

methodsThis single-center retrospective study included 2521 eyes (1712 patients) that underwent DMEK between January 2012 and December 2021. Patients were divided into four groups according to donor-to-recipient gender combinations (male-to-female, male-to-male, female-to-male, female-to-female) and were compared in terms of graft failure rate, visual acuity (VA), central corneal thickness (CCT), and endothelial cell count (ECC) preoperatively and at 1, 12 and 36 months postoperatively, as well as in terms of postoperative complications.

resultsOf the 2521 cases, 1647 (65%) were sex-mismatched (male-to-female or female-to-male) and 874 (35%) were sex-matched (female-to-female or male-to-male). Intraoperative preparation time of the grafts (p = 0.78) and difficulties in the intraoperative handling (p = 0.43) were comparable in all groups. Re-bubbling or re-keratoplasty was required with comparable frequency (p = 0.84; p = 0.61 respectively). The occurence of primary or secondary graft failure was not statistically significant different between the groups (p = 0.57). No confirmed case of immunological graft rejection occurred. Functional postoperative outcomes for ECC (p = 0.18 after 1 month, p = 0.13 after 12 months, p = 0.27 after 36 months), CCT (p = 0.58 after 4-6 weeks, p = 0.82 after 12 months, p = 0.78 after 36 months) and VA (p = 0.64 after 4-6 weeks, p = 0.47 after 12 months, p = 0.39 after 36 months) were comparable in all groups at the follow-up.

conclusionsIn this retrospective cohort, no documented immune graft rejection was observed, and sex mismatch did not influence intraoperative handling or postoperative interventions. However, prospective studies with standardized immunologic assessment are needed to clarify the role of donor-recipient sex mismatch in DMEK outcomes.

Indexed as

Descemet Stripping Endothelial KeratoplastyTissue DonorsAgedFemaleGraft RejectionHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsTreatment OutcomeVisual AcuityDescemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)Gender incompatibilityGraft failureHistocompatibility antigen (mHA)H-Y antigens

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.