Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41665723›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2026

Standardized reporting of perioperative complications after male artificial urinary sphincter implantation.

Navid Roessler, Malte W Vetterlein, Tim H J Konrad, Robert J Schulz, Max C Wagner, Jakob Klemm, Shahrokh F Shariat, Roland Dahlem, Margit Fisch, Tim A Ludwig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Navid RoesslerDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. n.roessler@uke.de.
Malte W VetterleinDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Tim H J KonradDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Robert J SchulzDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Max C WagnerDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Jakob KlemmDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Austrian Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Roland DahlemDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Margit FischDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Tim A LudwigDepartment of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically assess perioperative complications after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation using the European Association of Urology (EAU) complication reporting guidelines and evaluate long-term device outcomes.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed male patients undergoing AUS implantation between 2015 and 2020. Demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics were described. Early complications within 6 weeks were captured using a procedure-specific complication catalog and graded according to the Clavien–Dindo Classification (CDC), in line with EAU standardized reporting recommendations. Primary endpoints were overall and major complications (CDC grade ≥ III); secondary endpoint was explantation-free survival.

resultsA total of consecutive 227 AUS implantations (median age 73 years, IQR 67–76) were included. Severe stress urinary incontinence was predominantly post-radical prostatectomy (81%). Cuff types included distal double cuff (58%), bulbar single cuff (26%), and transcorporal cuff (16%). Complications occurred in 47% of cases, most frequently bleeding events (61%), followed by genitourinary (12%) and infectious events (11%). Major complications requiring a reintervention occurred in 7.9% of cases. Median follow-up was 52 months (IQR 32–66), with 5-year explantation-free survival of 73%. Explantation was required in 23% of cases, primarily due to urethral erosion and infection.

conclusionAUS implantation is associated with frequent early complications, though most are minor. Applying a predefined, procedure-specific complication catalog according to EAU guidelines ensures systematic, comprehensive, and transparent reporting. This approach highlights clinically relevant events, supports cross-study comparability, and informs individualized patient counseling and perioperative management.

Indexed as

Postoperative ComplicationsProsthesis ImplantationUrinary Incontinence, StressUrinary Sphincter, ArtificialAgedHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesGuideline adherencePerioperative carePostoperative complicationsQuality of health careUrinary sphincter, artificial

Identifiers

PMID41665723
PMCPMC12891164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.