ArticleWorld journal of urology2026
Standardized reporting of perioperative complications after male artificial urinary sphincter implantation.
Article in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-Surgical Evaluation in Stress Urinary Incontinence by Transperineal Ultrasound and Quality of Life Questionnaire-A Retrospective Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Therapeutic efficacy and predictive factors for a successful outcome after platelet-rich plasma injections in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo systematically assess perioperative complications after artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation using the European Association of Urology (EAU) complication reporting guidelines and evaluate long-term device outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed male patients undergoing AUS implantation between 2015 and 2020. Demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics were described. Early complications within 6 weeks were captured using a procedure-specific complication catalog and graded according to the Clavien–Dindo Classification (CDC), in line with EAU standardized reporting recommendations. Primary endpoints were overall and major complications (CDC grade ≥ III); secondary endpoint was explantation-free survival.
resultsA total of consecutive 227 AUS implantations (median age 73 years, IQR 67–76) were included. Severe stress urinary incontinence was predominantly post-radical prostatectomy (81%). Cuff types included distal double cuff (58%), bulbar single cuff (26%), and transcorporal cuff (16%). Complications occurred in 47% of cases, most frequently bleeding events (61%), followed by genitourinary (12%) and infectious events (11%). Major complications requiring a reintervention occurred in 7.9% of cases. Median follow-up was 52 months (IQR 32–66), with 5-year explantation-free survival of 73%. Explantation was required in 23% of cases, primarily due to urethral erosion and infection.
conclusionAUS implantation is associated with frequent early complications, though most are minor. Applying a predefined, procedure-specific complication catalog according to EAU guidelines ensures systematic, comprehensive, and transparent reporting. This approach highlights clinically relevant events, supports cross-study comparability, and informs individualized patient counseling and perioperative management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.