ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026
Balance confidence predicts incident injurious falls in older adults: a longitudinal study.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeFalls affect one-third of older adults each year, often resulting in low balance confidence, which is associated with reduced mobility and quality of life. This study examined the association between MFES scores and incident injurious falls and evaluated whether MFES scores mediate the relationship between previous and subsequent falls in older adults.
methodsData for participants (n = 952, age ≥ 65 yr) from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study were linked with the Victorian Emergency Minimum Dataset (VEMD). The outcome was the time to first emergency presentation for an injurious fall. Balance confidence was measured using the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES). Competing risk regression evaluated the MFES score as a predictor of incident injurious falls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis determined the optimal MFES cut point for predicting incident injurious falls based on the maximum Youden's index, while mediation analysis assessed MFES score's role between prior and subsequent falls.
resultsThe median follow-up time was 11.5 years (IQR: 5.9-19.0), with a total of 11,368 person-years. Over the follow-up period, 219 participants (23.0%) experienced at least one incident injurious fall, with an incidence rate of 19.3 per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 16.9-22.0). Low MFES score was a significant predictor of incident injurious falls (aSHR = 1.019, 95% CI: 1.005-1.033). Although an MFES cutoff of 55 was identified, the AUC (0.508) indicated no meaningful discriminative ability. Low MFES score explains 14.9% of the relationship between prior self-reported and subsequent injurious falls.
conclusionA low MFES score is associated with incident injurious falls and partially mediates the relationship between previous and subsequent falls. Although an optimal MFES cut point of 55 was identified, its very low specificity and lack of meaningful discriminative ability limit its reliability for prediction. These findings support recommendations, consistent with the World Falls Guidelines, to incorporate assessments of balance confidence-captured through validated measures such as the MFES-into multifactorial fall risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.