ReviewNeurosurgical review2026
Interpretable machine learning model for predicting rupture risk in anterior communicating artery aneurysms.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early prediction of brain aneurysm rupture is critical, as it enables timely clinical interventions and avoid the significant morbidity and mortality associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Anterior communicating artery aneurysm (ACoA) is the most common site of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. In this study, we developed a machine learning (ML) pipeline that uses demographic, clinical data and morphological measurements to predict rupture risk of ACoA, providing a non-invasive and cost-effective decision-support approach based on documented clinical and imaging-derived morphologic variables. The dataset consisted of 170 patient records, each including 24 demographic, morphological and clinical variables. An XGBoost-based feature ranking algorithm was employed, followed by feature incrementation approach to identify the top eight features for model development. Among several evaluated classifiers, the Random Forest model demonstrated the highest performance, achieving an accuracy of 88.82%, precision of 88.96%, recall of 88.82%, specificity of 88.82%, F1-score of 88.81%, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 94.80%. SHapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to interpret how each feature influenced the prediction, providing a clear picture of model’s decision-making rationale. Overall, the proposed ML pipeline showed promising internal performance, supporting further external and prospective validation for clinical decision support tool in the early identification and management of ACoA at risk of rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41665693What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.