ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2026
The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) as a Biomarker for Predicting Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Transarterial Chemoembolization and Lenvatinib, With or Without Programmed Death-1(PD-1) Inhibitors.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between the Prognostic Nutritional Index and survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Review
- Pre-TACE CK-MB/CK Ratio as an Independent Prognostic Biomarker in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCurrent treatment strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with lenvatinib and immunotherapy remain largely empirical due to the lack of reliable biomarkers. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in HCC patients treated with TACE plus lenvatinib, with or without programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of 237 patients with HCC who received TACE and lenvatinib-based therapy, with or without PD-1 inhibitors, between March 2021 and September 2023. Patients were randomly allocated into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio and stratified into low- and high-PNI groups based on an optimal PNI cut-off value. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the PNI groups using the log-rank test.
resultsIn both the training and validation sets, patients with higher PNI scores demonstrated significantly better OS and PFS than those with lower PNI scores. Multivariate Cox regression identified PNI score, treatment modality (TACE + lenvatinib ± PD-1 inhibitor), tumor diameter, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) as independent prognostic factors for OS. For PFS, independent predictors included PNI score, treatment modality, tumor diameter, Child-Pugh class, and AFP level. Subgroup analyses consistently showed superior OS in the high-PNI group across most strata, including those defined by treatment type, presence of portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) or extrahepatic metastasis (EHM), AFP level (≤ 400 or > 400 ng/mL), and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C.
conclusionThe PNI score is a promising biomarker for predicting survival in HCC patients receiving TACE combined with lenvatinib, with or without PD-1 inhibitors. Low PNI is associated with poor survival outcomes, highlighting its potential utility in risk stratification and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41665677What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.