ArticleMedical physics2026
Fluorescent nuclear track detectors for out-of-field neutron dosimetry in proton therapy.
Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fluorescent nuclear track detectors for out-of-field neutron dosimetry in proton therapy.Medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSecondary neutrons are a major concern regarding side effects in ion beam therapy because they contribute to the out-of-field dose, particularly important for sensitive patient groups such as pregnant and pediatric patients. Measuring these neutrons is challenging because of their high kinetic energy, which is imparted to charged particles like fragments and recoil protons. In addition, accurate measurements require small detectors that ideally do not disturb the radiation field when measuring inside a phantom. Fluorescent Nuclear Track Detectors (FNTDs) have already shown promising results in ion beam dosimetry and the measurement in fast neutron fields. Given their high spatial resolution and sensitivity, FNTDs offer a promising approach for characterizing secondary neutron doses in complex radiation environments, such as those encountered in proton therapy. PURPOSE: Establish a methodology for estimating neutron-induced out-of-field dose inside a phantom. The focus is to discuss the technical requirements and present initial experimental results from a proton treatment plan.
methodsThe analysis workflow for determining dose equivalent with FNTDs is introduced, including intensity-to-linear energy transfer (LET) in water conversion and track polar angle corrections. FNTDs were placed inside RW3 and polymethyl methacrylate phantoms and irradiated with a proton spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) plan. Experimental results from two downstream positions in each phantom were used to benchmark Monte Carlo simulations.
resultsA polar angle correction function was established, indicating intensity corrections of approximately a factor of 2 at
conclusionsThis work presents the first LET-based method using FNTDs to estimate out-of-field neutron dose for a proton SOBP plan, measured inside a phantom. Integrating this method into clinical workflows may improve out-of-field dose estimation for sensitive patient groups, such as pregnant or pediatric patients, by enabling prior dose assessments using anthropomorphic phantoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.