ArticlePsychophysiology2026
Physical Proximity With Social Support Regulates Vigilance to Threat: Evidence From Startle Reactivity During Emotional Stress Induction.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Influence of Shared Attention and Friendship on Emotional Processing: A Behavioral and EEG Hyperscanning Study.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Physical Proximity With Social Support Regulates Vigilance to Threat: Evidence From Startle Reactivity During Emotional Stress Induction.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to social support during emotional stress is one of the most important factors for the successful regulation of stress-induced psychophysiological activation, and is predictive of improved health and well-being. In this research we wanted to deepen our understanding of this buffering effect, focusing on the modulation of the startle reflex during a standardized stress induction as a function of the proximity with social resources as well as the relationship type with them. Seventy participants were exposed to the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) in one of three possible conditions: Alone, Together with their romantic partner, or Together with a stranger. Startle reactivity to a series of acoustic probes presented during the task was measured along with self-reported levels of anxiety. Results indicate that, independently of the social manipulation, stress induction is associated with a strong inhibition of the startle reflex. Furthermore, we found that access to social resources buffers this startle inhibition, showing that being together with others when facing a stressor regulates threat vigilance. We interpret these findings through the lens of the Social Baseline Theory, suggesting that startle dynamically tracks the load sharing process by which proximity with social resources optimizes the physiological as well as cognitive regulation of behavior in a threatening environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.