ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2026
The role of scalae geometry in cochlear mechanical responses: Pressure focusing in two and three dimensions.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Including two-dimensional pressure-focusing in transmission-line cochlear models.JASA express letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This paper illustrates effects of model dimensionality, and of common simplifying assumptions, regarding the geometry of the scalae, on the solution of cochlear mechanical models. We extend a previous theoretical framework from Duifhuis [(1988). Auditory Function: Neurological Bases for Hearing (Wiley, New York), pp. 189-212] to study differences between models that consider three-dimensional (3D) and two-dimensional (2D) fluid motion in the scalae, and how these differences depend on the assumed cochlear geometry. Our results show that, while cochlear mechanical responses obtained in 2D and 3D are nearly identical over the mid- and apical cochlear turn, they are significantly different in the base-where the basilar membrane (BM) is narrow-especially in the presence of active amplification. Our analysis reveals that a narrower BM intensifies the 3D short-wave "pressure-focusing" effect, which boosts the vibration of the sensory tissue at locations tuned to the stimulus frequency. Importantly, these 3D short-wave effects can be accounted for in carefully constructed 2D models, by appropriately projecting the cochlear 3D geometry in 2D. Our work shows that the cochlear 3D geometry plays a major role to high-frequency cochlear amplification-a phenomenon with a straightforward explanation and that can be included in more tractable 2D theories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.