ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2026
Evaluation of KU-F40 automated microscope for parasitology: when artificial intelligence meets old school microscopy.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of the AI-predictive ParaScoutEmerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) have a worldwide distribution and have a major impact on health, work capacity, and economy in many countries. Light microscopy is still considered the reference method for IPI diagnosis but is labor-intensive. KU-F40, an automated feces analyzer, combines automated microscopic examination of stool samples and deep learning artificial intelligence. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of KU-F40 for the diagnosis of IPI. A random collection of stool samples prescribed for IPI investigation was retrospectively collected from six clinical laboratories in Belgium along with external quality controls. All samples were analyzed in our laboratory by wet mount preparation using classic light microscopy as reference. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity for parasite detection/identification. Finally, we studied the improvement in parasite detection rate when increasing the number of pictures taken to 150% and 200% of the standard settings. A total of 267 clinical stool samples were included. Using standard settings, overall sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 45%, respectively. When considering only clinically relevant parasites, sensitivity was 95%. Increasing the number of pictures allowed to improve detection rate, but it remained under 90% for several targets. KU-F40 offers an innovative approach and provides welcome automation in the diagnosis of IPI. Currently, its performance does not allow it to be used as a screening tool with automatic validation of negative results. Critical missing features could enhance its performance, including the addition of a 10x magnification objective and additional parasites currently absent from the database.IMPORTANCEIntestinal parasitic infections have a worldwide distribution and are a global health concern in many countries. Light microscopy is still considered the reference method for diagnosis but is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and requires highly skilled and motivated technologists. In this paper, we evaluate the KU-F40, an automated feces analyzer designed to diagnose intestinal parasitic infections by combining automated light microscopy and deep learning artificial intelligence for detection and presumptive identification of several protozoans and helminths. As it relies on microscopy, this method enables the detection and identification of a predefined panel of parasites, whose morphology is known to the system and included in the database, without requiring prior diagnostic suspicion, similarly to multiplex PCR assays. The automation could improve the quality, standardization, and turnaround time of stool parasitology. This study is the first to evaluate the performance of the KU-F40 on a wide range of parasites, collected from six Belgian hospitals, including our two national reference centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.