ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026
Students as science communicators: using podcast creation and reflection via collaborative autoethnography to develop students' science communication skills.
Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Undergraduate science students will have opportunities, in their personal lives and future careers, to be science communicators. However, they must be trained in effective approaches to science communication. One medium by which students can engage in science communication is via podcasts, which are a tool for both science communication and science education. While there have been studies analyzing the impacts of podcasts on audiences, there is less examination in the literature of how the process of producing a science podcast influences the podcaster themselves, especially for student podcasters. Thus, in this article, we present a curriculum in which a group of student podcasters developed science podcasts about topics relevant to key concepts in biology and microbiology education, such as evolution as applied to antibiotic resistance. The students applied concepts of strategic and inclusive science communication to iteratively develop their podcasts. The second critical component of the curriculum is students engaging in collaborative autoethnography in order to reflexively consider how developing a podcast impacted them as developing science communicators. Thematic analysis of focus groups and student reflections revealed key themes about how students applied evidence from the science communication literature to their science podcasting process and about how students grew as scientists and science communicators during the process. This study provides insights for training of undergraduate science students in reflexive practice in science communication that is applicable to their future careers. Instructors can utilize the science podcast creation and/or collaborative autoethnography components of this curriculum in order to help develop their students as science communicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.