Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41665370›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2026

Students as science communicators: using podcast creation and reflection via collaborative autoethnography to develop students' science communication skills.

Nicole C Kelp, Georgina Concha Paredes, Lauren Ea, Kate McCollough, Leonie Weber, J Phil Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicole C KelpDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8462-5689
Georgina Concha ParedesSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Lauren EaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Kate McColloughSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
Leonie WeberSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.
J Phil GibsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0817-4120

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undergraduate science students will have opportunities, in their personal lives and future careers, to be science communicators. However, they must be trained in effective approaches to science communication. One medium by which students can engage in science communication is via podcasts, which are a tool for both science communication and science education. While there have been studies analyzing the impacts of podcasts on audiences, there is less examination in the literature of how the process of producing a science podcast influences the podcaster themselves, especially for student podcasters. Thus, in this article, we present a curriculum in which a group of student podcasters developed science podcasts about topics relevant to key concepts in biology and microbiology education, such as evolution as applied to antibiotic resistance. The students applied concepts of strategic and inclusive science communication to iteratively develop their podcasts. The second critical component of the curriculum is students engaging in collaborative autoethnography in order to reflexively consider how developing a podcast impacted them as developing science communicators. Thematic analysis of focus groups and student reflections revealed key themes about how students applied evidence from the science communication literature to their science podcasting process and about how students grew as scientists and science communicators during the process. This study provides insights for training of undergraduate science students in reflexive practice in science communication that is applicable to their future careers. Instructors can utilize the science podcast creation and/or collaborative autoethnography components of this curriculum in order to help develop their students as science communicators.

Indexed as

collaborative autoethnographypodcastreflexivityscience communicationthematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41665370
PMCPMC13130979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.