Article in mBio, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Benjamin E GewurzDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3965-3418
Epstein-Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) accounts for ~9% to 10% of gastric cancers worldwide and is defined by a distinctive molecular profile, including extreme hypermethylation of the DNA. Targeting this aberrant methylation may be a potential therapeutic strategy. EBV
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Integrated transcriptomic and methylome analysis reveals retinoic acid pathway activation after decitabine treatment in EBV-associated gastric cancer. · full record | OpenQuestion