Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41665297›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2026

Systematic arcminute-scale fixational offsets in patients with early visual cortex damage.

Ashley M Clark, Sanjana Kapisthalam, Matthew R Cavanaugh, Krystel R Huxlin, Martina Poletti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ashley M ClarkDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Sanjana KapisthalamDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Matthew R CavanaughDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flaum Eye Institute and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Krystel R HuxlinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Flaum Eye Institute and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Martina PolettiDepartment of Brain & Cognitive Sciences and Center for Visual Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.

Funding

VISUAL SCIENCE RESEARCH CTR SUPPORTP30EY001319 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MICHELE RUCCI · 1985 to 2026
$17.5M
VISUAL SCIENCET32EY007125 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Krystel R Huxlin, Duje Tadin · 1990 to 2026
$7.1M
Vision recovery in cortical blindnessR01EY027314 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MARISA CARRASCO, Krystel R Huxlin · 2017 to 2026
$5.3M
Vision, Attention and Eye Movements at the Scale of the FoveolaR01EY029788 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Martina Poletti · 2019 to 2026
$3.4M
Mechanisms of visual learning in cortical blindnessR01EY021209 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI HUXLIN, KRYSTEL R · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001319NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021209NEI NIH HHS R01 EY027314NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029788NEI NIH HHS T32 EY007125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cortically induced blindness (CB) resulting from stroke damage to the early visual cortex leads to extensive, typically extrafoveal visual deficits and is known to alter large-scale oculomotor behavior. Here, we show that even with preserved foveal acuity, fixational oculomotor behavior is subtly altered in CB patients. Using high-precision eye tracking, we observed a small but consistent gaze offset toward the blind field during passive fixation, which disappeared during a high-acuity central task. Despite this offset, fixation precision in both tasks was comparable, and it was similar between CB patients and age-matched controls. Curiously, the underlying oculomotor dynamics were also similar across the two task conditions: Microsaccades exhibited nonsignificant directional tendencies, while ocular drift was biased away from the blind field. Our findings indicate that the adult oculomotor system dynamically adapts to asymmetric visual injury and/or input. We speculate that the small fixational offsets observed in CB may reflect an attentional pointer toward the blind field and/or a compensatory oculomotor rebalancing that counteracts an asymmetric visual drive following cortical damage. Together, these results reveal a surprising preservation of context-dependent fixation control following early visual cortex damage in adulthood.

Indexed as

Blindness, CorticalFixation, OcularVisual CortexAdultAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaccadesStrokeVisual AcuityVisual Fields

Identifiers

PMID41665297
PMCPMC12898927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.