Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41665080›Full record

ArticleHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2026

The clinical and cost-effectiveness of improving sleep via carer delivered strategies in people with dementia: the DREAMS START parallel multi-centre RCT.

Penny Rapaport, Sarah Amador, Mariam Adeleke, Julie Barber, Sube Banerjee, Ankita Bhojwani, Georgina Charlesworth, Chris Clarke, Colin Espie, Lina Gonzalez and 11 more

Abstract readEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Penny RapaportDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0479-6950
Sarah AmadorDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4196-6410
Mariam AdelekeDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7272-2462
Julie BarberDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5762-762X
Sube BanerjeeFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8083-7649
Ankita BhojwaniDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0003-6545-1654
Georgina CharlesworthDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5278-1756
Chris ClarkeTees Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8957-0795
Colin EspieSir Jules Thorn Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1294-8734
Lina GonzalezDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-7050-8906
Rossana HorsleyAlzheimer's Society, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4966-5997
Rachael HunterDepartment of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7447-8934
Simon KyleSir Jules Thorn Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9581-5311
Monica ManelaDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4522-7105
Naaheed MukadamDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8635-9521
Malvika MuralidharDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0007-4925-8909
Malgorzata RaczekCentre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9507-3293
Zuzana WalkerDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7346-8200
Lucy WebsterDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9152-4990
Hang YuanNuffield department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5944-1925
Gill LivingstonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6741-5516

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sleep disturbances are common and distressing for people with dementia and their family carers and can lead to carers having interrupted sleep, low mood and care breakdown. Medication can have harmful side effects and is generally ineffective. Non-pharmacological interventions should be first-line treatments, yet until now there have not been effective treatments. Objectives: To establish whether Dementia RElAted Manual for Sleep; STrAtegies for RelaTives (DREAMS START), a multicomponent intervention, reduced sleep disturbance in people with dementia living at home at 8 months compared with National Health Service treatment (treatment as usual). Design and methods: We conducted a two-arm, multicentre, parallel-arm, superiority randomised controlled trial with masked outcome assessment. Participants were randomised (1 : 1 ratio) to DREAMS START intervention plus treatment as usual or treatment as usual alone. Analyses were intention to treat. We conducted a mixed-method process evaluation with additional substudies: one exploring how United Kingdom-based South Asians experience sleep disturbance and dementia, and one exploring the interaction of sleep, dementia and long-term conditions. Settings and participants: We recruited dyads of people with dementia and sleep disturbance living at home and family carers from 12 National Health Service trusts and the Join Dementia Research service in England. Interventions: DREAMS START is a six-session, multicomponent, manualised intervention delivered to family carers of people with dementia who implement strategies to improve their relatives' sleep. It is delivered face to face or remotely by non-clinically trained graduates weekly or fortnightly and incorporates information about sleep and dementia, promotes de-arousal at night, adaptive stimulus control (e.g. bedtime routine maintenance), daytime behavioural activation, increasing access to light, improving carer sleep and making a tailored action plan. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was sleep disturbance measured using the Sleep Disorders Inventory at 8 months. Results: Between February 2021 and March 2023, 377 dyads were randomly assigned, 189 to treatment as usual and 188 to DREAMS START plus treatment as usual. Mean age of participants with dementia was 79.4 years (standard deviation 9.0), and 206 (55%) were women. Mean Sleep Disorders Inventory score at 8 months was lower in the intervention versus treatment-as-usual arm [15.16 (standard deviation 12.77), Conclusion: DREAMS START plus treatment as usual is clinically effective in reducing sleep disturbance in people living at home with dementia at 8 months, demonstrating sustained effectiveness beyond intervention delivery. DREAMS START is likely to be cost-effective, and delivery by non-clinically trained graduates increases potential for National Health Service implementation at scale. Limitations: We relied upon family carers' proxy and self-reported outcomes, with intervention participants potentially more invested and optimistic, increasing risk of bias. Additionally, based on our feasibility randomised controlled trial, we did not include actigraphy or another direct measure of sleep and activity. Future work: Studies should explore the longer-term effect of DREAMS START (we are following up participants at 2 years), and there should be an implementation study considering delivery and scaling up DREAMS START in real-world healthcare settings. Funding: This synopsis presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme as award number NIHR128761.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaSleep Wake DisordersAgedAged, 80 and overCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsQuality of LifeState MedicineUnited KingdomCOST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSISDEMENTIAINTERVENTIONMULTICOMPONENTPROCESS EVALUATIONRANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALSLEEP DISTURBANCE

Identifiers

PMID41665080
PMCPMC12907995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.