ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2026
The Effect of Removable Space Maintainer Use on Oral-Health-Related Quality of Life in Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to evaluate the oral-health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) of children aged 8-10 years using removable space maintainers (RSMs) and to compare their outcomes with caries-free healthy peers. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 51 children who had been using RSMs for at least six months and 51 systemically healthy and caries-free children as controls. All participants were aged 8-10 years. Demographic data were recorded, and the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ8-10) was administered. The regular use of RSM was determined based on statements from both children and parents. Group comparisons of CPQ8-10 scores were performed using the Mann-Whitney U test and the independent samples t-test, with the level of significance set at P 0.05.
resultsChildren using RSMs had significantly higher total CPQ8-10 scores (26.88 ± 11.94) compared to the control group (12.24 ± 7.31) (P 0.001). Additionally, RSM users demonstrated significantly higher scores in all subscales, including oral symptoms, functional limitations, emotional well-being, and social well-being (P 0.05), showing poorer OHRQoL. No significant differences were observed between regular and irregular RSM users in any CPQ8-10 domain (P > 0.05). Gender and age did not significantly affect total CPQ8-10 scores.
conclusionThe use of RSMs was associated with lower oral-health-related quality of life among children aged 8-10 years when compared with caries-free peers. RSM use could have exerted a deleterious effect on functional limitations, emotional and social well-being. Clinicians may need to consider psychosocial adaptation in addition to clinical indications when planning treatment with RSMs and provide supportive, child-centred approaches during follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.