Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41664878›Full record

ReviewActa ophthalmologica2026

Neuroeconomics and myopia prevention: A framework for public health intervention.

Dan-Lin Li, Ting-Han Guo, Andrzej Grzybowski, Chen-Wei Pan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta ophthalmologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dan-Lin LiSchool of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0800-4308
Ting-Han GuoSchool of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Andrzej GrzybowskiInstitute for Research in Ophthalmology, Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, Poznan, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3724-2391
Chen-Wei PanSchool of Public Health, Suzhou Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3362-4613

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82504435Suzhou Science and Technology Planning Project SYW2025191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims to outline the application of neuroeconomics in paediatric myopia prevention, offering a framework for designing public health interventions that target decision-making mechanisms such as intertemporal choice, social preferences and neurohormonal regulation. We synthesized theories and empirical evidence from neuroeconomics, psychology and neuroscience. Multimodal approaches-including behavioural tasks (e.g. delay discounting, Ultimatum Game), functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), pupillometry and salivary assays-were used to evaluate how interventions influence neurocognitive processes. Neuroeconomic research reveals that myopia-related behaviours involve neural competition between impulsive and regulatory systems, temporal discounting of future rewards and modulation by social norms and neurohormones (e.g. dopamine, oxytocin). Intervention strategies incorporating immediate incentives, social normative feedback, environmental nudges and reduced cognitive effort show potential in promoting outdoor time and behaviour change. Neuroeconomics provides a novel framework for myopia prevention by targeting neural computation mechanisms. Future research should focus on cross-cultural and developmental validation while addressing ethical and implementation challenges to advance precise and equitable public health strategies.

Indexed as

MyopiaPublic HealthDecision MakingHumansmyopianeuroeconomicsprevention

Identifiers

PMID41664878
PMCPMC13460378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.