ArticleNeuro-oncology advances
On the value of microsurgical resection compared to biopsy in elderly glioblastoma patients: A retrospective multicenter analysis and scoring system proposal.
Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Benefits of tumor resection in elderly glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients within the framework of multimodal treatment remains a matter of debate. This retrospective, multicenter analysis aims at the identification of patients who are most likely to benefit from microsurgical resection, and the development of a scoring system to improve future decision-making. Methods: Demographic and outcome data of GBM patients aged 65 years and older, who underwent resection or biopsy at three centers between 2003 and 2022, were analyzed. Frailty was assessed by the Modified 5-Item Frailty Index (mFI-5). Results: We studied 537 patients (median age 73.4 years); 369 (68.7%) underwent resection and 168 (31.3%) underwent biopsy. Resected patients were younger, were preoperatively more commonly functionally independent, were less frail, and had larger tumor volumes (all Conclusions: Selected elderly glioblastoma patients might benefit from microsurgical resection. A score to guide neurosurgical treatment decision-making and patient counseling was developed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.