ReviewCureus2026
Use of Ultraviolet C-Radiation Therapy in Trauma and Orthopaedics: A Current State of Evidence.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultraviolet-C (UV-C) radiation exhibits potent germicidal capabilities through DNA and RNA damage in microorganisms. Its utilisation in orthopaedics began primarily for theatre sterilisation. Current applications focus extensively on surface, air, and equipment sterilisation within orthopaedic theatres. The aim of this scoping review was to establish the current uses and practices of UV-C in orthopaedic surgery. A comprehensive literature review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines, sourcing articles from PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar from inception till January 2025. Studies included addressed UV-C applications in orthopaedic sterilisation and disinfection, financial analyses, and clinical infection outcomes. Data extracted included study parameters, methods, UV-C exposure specifics, microbial colony counts, and outcomes. Out of 2574 articles identified initially, 23 studies met the inclusion criteria. Fifteen articles addressed UV-C sterilisation, highlighting substantial microbial reductions on theatre surfaces and equipment, although effectiveness varied by organism and exposure duration. Eight studies investigated UV-C's impact on infection rates and skin health, showing significant infection reduction in arthroplasty cases without major adverse dermatological effects. Financial analysis was available from only one study, which indicated significant cost savings compared to traditional methods. UV-C radiation appears effective in reducing microbial contamination in orthopaedic theatres, complementing traditional cleaning practices. It offers promising infection reduction in arthroplasty with manageable safety concerns. Indeed, use of UV-C may be an efficient way of reducing infection risk without the need for antibiotic use, and this can contribute to reduction in the risk of antimicrobial resistance. Future research should focus on refining protocols and exploring broader clinical and economic impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.