Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41664748›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Biologic Therapies: A Systematic Review of the Indications, Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes in Ear, Nose, and Throat Diseases.

Zainab Al Saloom, Mahmood Alawainati, Zahraa Abdeen, Israa Qadmi, Alaa Mandeel, Khaled AlAani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zainab Al SaloomEar, Nose, and Throat (ENT), Government Hospital Bahrain, Manama, BHR.
Mahmood AlawainatiMedicine, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Manama, BHR.
Zahraa AbdeenEar, Nose, and Throat (ENT), Alsalam Hospital, Manama, BHR.
Israa QadmiEar, Nose, and Throat (ENT), Government Hospital Bahrain, Manama, BHR.
Alaa MandeelEar, Nose, and Throat (ENT), Salmaniya Medical Complex, Manama, BHR.
Khaled AlAaniSurgery, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, BHR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biologic therapies, such as omalizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab, are novel therapeutic agents that offer a targeted approach for managing chronic inflammatory and immune-mediated ear, nose, and throat (ENT) conditions. However, the indications, efficacy, and adverse events of these medications in various ENT disorders have not been studied before. Therefore, this systematic review was performed to evaluate their indications, clinical efficacy, and safety in ENT management. A systematic search was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines across five major databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of Science. Studies published between 2015 and May 2025 were considered, and additional manual searches and reference screening were also performed. Eligible studies included those written in English, assessing biologics in ENT diseases, and reporting on at least one of the following outcomes: clinical efficacy, safety, or indications. The study characteristics, population details, medications used, and outcomes were assessed. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tool, with disagreements resolved by a senior assessor. A total of 497 records were identified, and after screening and quality assessment, 10 trials involving 2,406 patients were included. The primary indication of biologics use across nine studies was chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), while one study assessed allergic rhinitis. Most trials compared biologics to a placebo, except one study that evaluated mepolizumab in combination with functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Biologics consistently demonstrated clinically significant reductions in endoscopic nasal polyp scores (P<0.05) and improvements in Visual Analogue Scale (P<0.05), SinoNasal Outcome Test (P<0.05), and olfactory function (P<0.001). Imaging findings (Lund-Mackay scores) were also in favor of biologics (P<0.05). Furthermore, biologics were associated with reduced need for repeat surgery (mepolizumab), lower serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels (dupilumab), and better productivity and quality of life (omalizumab). The safety profile was favorable, with nasopharyngitis (4-47%), headache (7-25%), and injection-site reactions (6-40%) being the most common adverse events, while no fatal events were reported (0%). In summary, biologics improved clinical symptoms, nasal polyp scores, olfaction, and quality of life in ENT conditions, particularly CRSwNP and allergic rhinitis, with favorable safety profiles and additional benefits, including reduced need for surgery and lower IgE levels.

Indexed as

biological therapylabyrinth diseasesnasal polypsotolaryngologyrhinosinusitis

Identifiers

PMID41664748
PMCPMC12883241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.