ReviewCureus2026
Current Perspectives on Urolithiasis: Pathogenesis, Clinical Management, and Treatment.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Kidney Parenchymal Volume Loss and Functional Loss After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.Research and reports in urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urolithiasis is a common and recurrent urological condition with significant clinical and economic implications worldwide. In light of new evidence on evaluating and managing urolithiasis, this review summarizes the current literature and guidelines. The development of urolithiasis is influenced by a complex interplay of dietary, metabolic, environmental, and genetic factors, with calcium-based stones constituting the majority of cases. Patients may present with a wide spectrum of symptoms, ranging from severe renal colic to incidental, asymptomatic findings. Accurate diagnosis requires the appropriate use of laboratory testing and imaging modalities. Non-contrast CT is considered the gold standard for diagnosis, and ultrasonography is recommended as the primary initial tool in many clinical settings. Management strategies depend on stone size, location, symptom severity, and the presence of complications, such as infection or obstruction. Most stones are expelled spontaneously; however, effective treatment options are available, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for pain control, medical expulsive therapy, and minimally invasive procedures such as extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. These options allow for individualized and highly successful care. Ongoing advances in imaging, medical therapy, and surgical techniques enhance outcomes, reduce recurrence rates, and lessen the overall healthcare burden posed by urolithiasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.