ArticleArchives of academic emergency medicine2026
Machine Learning Models for Predicting the Need for Early Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Multiple Trauma Patients.
Article in Archives of academic emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: One of the preventable contributors to trauma mortality is hemorrhagic shock, which requires early recognition and immediate intervention. In this retrospective analysis, we aimed to develop and optimize machine learning (ML) algorithms to predict the need for packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion within 24 hours of injury in multiple trauma patients. Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study analyzed consecutive multiple trauma patients admitted to the emergency department. The outcome was transfusion of at least one unit of PRBC within the first 24 hours of traumatic injury. SHAP analysis was employed for feature selection, and the five key predictors were identified and entered in the models: Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), hemoglobin (Hb), pulse rate (PR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and pulse pressure. The dataset was split 80:20 for training/testing, and multiple machine learning algorithms were evaluated based on area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: The study cohort consisted of 908 patients, with a median age of 34 years. PRBC transfusions were more common in older adults with lower GCS scores, higher PR, lower SBP, lower pulse pressure, and lower Hb levels on admission. Among the machine learning models, Random Forest performed best (AUC: 0.997, sensitivity: 0.938, specificity: 0.994), followed by K-Nearest Neighbors and Logistic Regression, both of which showed perfect specificity but lower sensitivity. Conclusion: Random Forest outperformed other ML algorithms, achieving high discriminative ability, sensitivity, and specificity. PR, GCS, Hb, SBP, and pulse pressure were the most influential predictors of the need for early transfusion. Despite promising results, further multicenter validation studies are needed to confirm the real-world applicability of these models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.