SynthesisTherapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease
Systolic blood pressure range in patients with intermediate- to high-risk pulmonary embolism undergoing advanced treatment: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite continuous advances in management over the last two decades for pulmonary embolism (PE), treating intermediate- to high-risk PE remains challenging. There is a critical need to expand our understanding of the clinical spectrum beyond systolic blood pressure (SBP) to inform the intricate decision-making process for initiating advanced treatment in patients with intermediate- to high-risk PE.
objectivesWe aimed to characterize the range of SBP values in patients with intermediate- to high-risk PE undergoing advanced therapy across different clinical settings. The secondary objective included the incidence of bleeding complications (intracranial, major, and minor).
designWe conducted a systematic review in alignment with PRISMA guidelines. The review involves a comprehensive, structured search of multiple electronic databases. DATA SOURCES AND
methodsWe created two groups: Group 1, case reports and series, and Group 2, randomized control trials and cohorts with intermediate-risk PE who underwent advanced treatment. In addition, we performed an exploratory analysis in Group 1, created solely for descriptive purposes, to determine the frequency of the previously mentioned impending deterioration factors in the literature and further clarify their potential role in initiating advanced treatment.
resultsWe identified 1871 intermediate-high risk PE patients who received advanced therapy, divided into two groups: Group 1 for case reports and series, and Group 2 for randomized controlled trials and cohorts. In total, 77.1% reported SBP; the weighted average was 125.8 and 129.2 mmHg for Groups 1 and 2, respectively. The most common initial clinical presentations were dyspnea, syncope, and chest pain. In the exploratory analysis, we found that borderline SBP (110-120 mmHg), right ventricular dysfunction, and heart rate (⩾120 bpm) were the most frequent impending clinical deterioration factors.
conclusionThis systematic review shows that the SBP range for advanced treatment (129.2 and 125.8 mmHg) aligns with previous clinical models. However, it is important to recognize that while these SBP ranges may suggest practice variation, causality or definitive clinical instability cannot be inferred from aggregate data without patient-level outcomes. Outside of randomized controlled trials, clinical decision-making regarding advanced treatment may not fully align with international recommendations in real-world scenarios.
trial registrationResearch Registry number: 2065.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.