ArticleJournal of sleep research2026
Rest Assured: The Association of Structural, Functional Support, and Loneliness With Subjective Sleep Health.
Article in Journal of sleep research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sleep is increasingly understood as a socially embedded phenomenon. This study examined how structural and functional aspects of social support, as well as loneliness, relate to sleep health in a German sample of middle-aged adults (N = 5388). Drawing on the socio-ecological model of sleep health, we assessed the contributions of social support dimensions while accounting for age, sex, and socioeconomic status, as well as psychological covariates. The results of the binary logistic regression showed that functional support (ESSI), friend network size (LSNS6), and loneliness (CES-D item 14) significantly (p < 0.001) predicted sleep health (PSQI), while family network size did not. The portion of explained variance was small (4%-5%). Results remained robust after adjusting for age, sex, and socioeconomic status, but no longer when including psychological covariates (GAD-7, SWLS, CES-D), in which case only the friend network size remained significant (p = 0.019). Women were significantly more affected by poor sleep health than men, and with higher socioeconomic status, fewer people reported suffering from poor sleep (all: p < 0.001). Additional subgroup analysis revealed higher age as a risk factor for worse sleep health in women only, while the friend network was only relevant in men. Our findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between structural and functional dimensions of social support in sleep health research and interventions, and suggest a potential sex-by-age interaction. Future research should promote equity by including diverse populations and longitudinally examine how social support, especially friend networks, affects sleep across genders, ages, and contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.