ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2026
Improving hospital-based care for patients with injection-drug related infections: provider perspectives.
Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInjection-related severe bacterial infections (SBIs), including skin and soft tissue infections, endocarditis, and osteomyelitis, are rising in prevalence in the United States and disproportionately affect people who inject drugs (PWID). Hospitalization for SBI presents a critical opportunity to engage patients in addiction and infectious disease care, yet healthcare systems often fail to capitalize on this moment.
methodsThis qualitative study explores the perspectives of 22 clinical stakeholders, including physicians, surgeons, nurses, and social workers, on barriers and strategies to improve care for hospitalized people who inject drugs (PWID) with substance use disorders (SUDs). Participants were recruited through purposive sampling from a large urban healthcare institution and selected external sites. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.
resultsThree core themes emerged: empowering clinical teams, enhancing patient care, and improving interdisciplinary workflows. Participants called for stronger provider education on substance use disorders, stigma reduction, and communication; expanded access to addiction consults, harm reduction tools, peer navigators, and flexible discharge options such as OPAT with coordinated follow-up. Barriers included limited staffing, inconsistent access to addiction specialists and peers, and institutional inertia around discharge and reimbursement. Stakeholders highlighted telemedicine and structured interdisciplinary communication as means to prevent care fragmentation, noting that patient-directed discharges often stem from unmanaged withdrawal, stigma, and mistrust within existing hospital systems.
conclusionsOur findings align with prior research on addiction consult models and highlight emerging support for hybrid care delivery models that integrate harm reduction, peer support, and telehealth. However, practical and structural limitations, such as policy constraints, funding gaps, and misaligned institutional incentives, remain significant obstacles. This study contributes to a growing body of literature calling for targeted, feasible interventions that can transform hospital-based care for PWID with SBIs. Future work should address patient perspectives and evaluate outcomes of proposed strategies to guide institutional investment and policy reform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.