Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41664224›Full record

ArticleBorderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation2026

Estimating and learning personality traits of and from women with borderline personality disorder.

Lisa M Doppelhofer, Raphael Perla, Koen M M Frolichs, Gabriela Rosenblau, Sabine C Herpertz, Christoph W Korn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa M DoppelhoferDepartment of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. lisamarie.doppelhofer@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Raphael PerlaDepartment of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Koen M M FrolichsDepartment of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gabriela RosenblauDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C, USA.
Sabine C HerpertzDepartment of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph W KornDepartment of General Psychiatry, Center for Psychosocial Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurately perceiving and learning about others’ personalities is crucial for successful social relationships. Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) is marked by unstable interpersonal dynamics, an unstable and negative self-concept, and a tendency to evaluate others unfavorably. Individuals with BPD are also more likely to be viewed negatively by others and experience social stigmatization. This study investigated whether women with BPD exhibit negativity biases when evaluating their own and others’ personality traits, and how these biases influence learning about others.

methodsThirty women with BPD and thirty-one age- and intelligence-matched controls estimated and learned the personality of six individuals (learning profiles) by predicting their self-ratings on 40 personality traits, balanced across the Big Five personality dimensions. After each prediction, participants received feedback with the target’s actual rating, allowing participants to gradually learn each profile’s personality. Three profiles reflected BPD group personality patterns and three profiles reflected control group patterns. Crucially, participants were told that these profiles were from real individuals but were unaware of their clinical status.

resultsAs hypothesized, the BPD group rated themselves more negatively than controls, both at the trait level and on standardized personality measures (NEO-FFI, PID-5-BF). When evaluating others, both groups rated BPD profiles similarly, but the control group rated control profiles more favorably. For both groups, accuracy improved slightly over time for control profiles but not BPD profiles, suggesting that BPD trait patterns are inherently harder to learn. Computational modeling indicated that both groups used fine-grained learning strategies—regardless of profile type—with no credible group differences in learning mechanisms.

conclusionThese findings demonstrate that individuals with BPD exhibit pervasive negativity biases in self- and other-evaluations, yet retain intact social learning capacities. This suggests that interpersonal difficulties in BPD may stem more from negatively biased expectations than from deficits in learning. Moreover, the inherent difficulty in learning about BPD-like personality profiles—observed in both groups—may hinder mutual understanding and contribute to persistent social challenges. Importantly, the intact learning capacity points to a valuable therapeutic resource: targeting negative social expectations may help to reduce bias and improve social functioning in BPD.

Indexed as

Borderline personality disorderComputational modellingPersonality traitsReinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID41664224
PMCPMC12888613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.