ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Intelligent identification of medical and veterinary intracellular protozoa by using self-supervised learning.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundZoonotic diseases pose a major threat to both human and animal health, contributing significantly to global morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective control and treatment, with microscopic examination serving as the gold standard, supplemented by highly sensitive molecular biology techniques. However, these confirmatory methods require skilled personnel and are subject to inter- and intra-rater variability. An innovative solution lies in artificial intelligence (AI)-powered automated tools, which offer a promising alternative. This study aimed to develop a self-supervised learning (SSL) approach using the Distillation with No Labels (DiNOv2) algorithm to extract features of protozoa from Giemsa-stained blood samples.
methodsThe development of self-supervised learning algorithms, including DiNOv2, was based on archived samples of clinically significant and significant veterinary microorganisms. These models were evaluated in comparison to a baseline Vision Transformer (ViT).
resultsAmong the tested SSL models, the DiNOv2-Small version achieved exceptional performance, surpassing 99% accuracy and specificity while maintaining the lowest misclassification rate (0.263). It also demonstrated a high area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.990, underscoring its robust classification capability. Remarkably, even when trained on only 20% of the dataset, the SSL models retained performance levels comparable to baseline models trained on the full dataset. However, further reducing the sample size below 20% led to notable declines in evaluation metrics: accuracy dropped by 5-7%, recall decreased from 37.9% to 35.1%, precision fell from 35% to 25.2%, and the F1 score declined from 31.1% to 21.5%. Additionally, the AUC decreased by 4-11%, while the misclassification rate increased, indicating reduced robustness. A key limitation of this study was the highly imbalanced fine-tuned dataset between classes. Nevertheless, the inconsistent performance observed may be mitigated by employing the larger DiNOv2 model, which improves the F1 score and enhances the model's ability to handle imbalanced data while reducing reliance on labeled data.
conclusionsThe proposed method can assist laboratory technicians, particularly in resource-limited healthcare settings. Furthermore, the findings support the potential deployment of this AI-based tool for automated screening in both medical and veterinary applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.