Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41664222›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2026

Intelligent identification of medical and veterinary intracellular protozoa by using self-supervised learning.

Veerayuth Kittichai, Morakot Kaewthamasorn, Naruchit Soiphet, Teerawat Tongloy, Santhad Chuwongin, Siridech Boonsang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Veerayuth KittichaiFaculty of Medicine, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Morakot KaewthamasornCenter of Excellence in Veterinary Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Naruchit SoiphetSchool of Integrated Innovative Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Teerawat TongloySchool of Integrated Innovative Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Santhad ChuwonginSchool of Integrated Innovative Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand.
Siridech BoonsangDepartment of Electrical Engineering, School of Engineering, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang, Bangkok, Thailand. siridech.bo@kmitl.ac.th.

Funding

King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang and National Science Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF) RE-KRIS/FF68/40
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundZoonotic diseases pose a major threat to both human and animal health, contributing significantly to global morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis is crucial for effective control and treatment, with microscopic examination serving as the gold standard, supplemented by highly sensitive molecular biology techniques. However, these confirmatory methods require skilled personnel and are subject to inter- and intra-rater variability. An innovative solution lies in artificial intelligence (AI)-powered automated tools, which offer a promising alternative. This study aimed to develop a self-supervised learning (SSL) approach using the Distillation with No Labels (DiNOv2) algorithm to extract features of protozoa from Giemsa-stained blood samples.

methodsThe development of self-supervised learning algorithms, including DiNOv2, was based on archived samples of clinically significant and significant veterinary microorganisms. These models were evaluated in comparison to a baseline Vision Transformer (ViT).

resultsAmong the tested SSL models, the DiNOv2-Small version achieved exceptional performance, surpassing 99% accuracy and specificity while maintaining the lowest misclassification rate (0.263). It also demonstrated a high area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.990, underscoring its robust classification capability. Remarkably, even when trained on only 20% of the dataset, the SSL models retained performance levels comparable to baseline models trained on the full dataset. However, further reducing the sample size below 20% led to notable declines in evaluation metrics: accuracy dropped by 5-7%, recall decreased from 37.9% to 35.1%, precision fell from 35% to 25.2%, and the F1 score declined from 31.1% to 21.5%. Additionally, the AUC decreased by 4-11%, while the misclassification rate increased, indicating reduced robustness. A key limitation of this study was the highly imbalanced fine-tuned dataset between classes. Nevertheless, the inconsistent performance observed may be mitigated by employing the larger DiNOv2 model, which improves the F1 score and enhances the model's ability to handle imbalanced data while reducing reliance on labeled data.

conclusionsThe proposed method can assist laboratory technicians, particularly in resource-limited healthcare settings. Furthermore, the findings support the potential deployment of this AI-based tool for automated screening in both medical and veterinary applications.

Indexed as

Data partitionMicroscopic examinationSelf-supervised learningSupervised learningZoonotic diseases

Identifiers

PMID41664222
PMCPMC12937529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.