ReviewJournal of cannabis research2026
Integrating cannabis and gaming: re-evaluating their business intersection.
Review in Journal of cannabis research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper examines the intersection of cannabis and gaming laws in the United States. A particular emphasis is placed on Nevada for its recognition as a leader in the gaming and cannabis industry. To better understand the issue, we explored various factors contributing to the separation, ranging from federal to local concerns at both the operational and state levels. Given the unpredictability of federal enforcement, gaming regulators and state regulators must address the risks associated with cannabis innovation. Despite the exclusion, there is growing support for incorporating cannabis into the gaming sector, similar to other markets, particularly in high-profile areas like the Las Vegas Strip. The paper questions whether the separations are appropriate within legal, policy, and business structures, apart from the activities. While acknowledging that public initiatives focused on practical activities are essential, this paper focuses on the framework that led to the original findings. Moreover, this paper examines the regulatory differences between jurisdictions that permit gambling and gaming, and identifies potential risks associated with the separation of these industries.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.