Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41664221›Full record

ReviewJournal of cannabis research2026

Integrating cannabis and gaming: re-evaluating their business intersection.

Riana Durrett, Juliana Ness, Marla Royne Stafford, Margaret McLetchie, Jordyn Sanders

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cannabis research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Riana DurrettCannabis Policy Institute, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89154, USA.
Juliana NessCannabis Policy Institute, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89154, USA.
Marla Royne StaffordCannabis Policy Institute, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89154, USA. Marla.stafford@unlv.edu.
Margaret McLetchieMcLetchie Law, Las Vegas, NV, 89101, USA.
Jordyn SandersCannabis Policy Institute, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV, 89154, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper examines the intersection of cannabis and gaming laws in the United States. A particular emphasis is placed on Nevada for its recognition as a leader in the gaming and cannabis industry. To better understand the issue, we explored various factors contributing to the separation, ranging from federal to local concerns at both the operational and state levels. Given the unpredictability of federal enforcement, gaming regulators and state regulators must address the risks associated with cannabis innovation. Despite the exclusion, there is growing support for incorporating cannabis into the gaming sector, similar to other markets, particularly in high-profile areas like the Las Vegas Strip. The paper questions whether the separations are appropriate within legal, policy, and business structures, apart from the activities. While acknowledging that public initiatives focused on practical activities are essential, this paper focuses on the framework that led to the original findings. Moreover, this paper examines the regulatory differences between jurisdictions that permit gambling and gaming, and identifies potential risks associated with the separation of these industries.

Identifiers

PMID41664221
PMCPMC12983983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.