Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41664213›Full record

ArticleJournal of ovarian research2026

Exploring the optimal cutoff point and genomic characteristics for PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy in early recurrence of ovarian cancer.

Luxin Ye, Yourong Chen, Yan Chen, Qian Zhao, Xianzhong Cheng, Xuening Wang, Xia Xu, Wenwen Guo, Xiaoxiang Chen, Jing Ni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luxin Ye *Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of innovative Cancer Diagnosis & Therapeutics, 42# Baiziting street, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China.
Yourong Chen *Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of innovative Cancer Diagnosis & Therapeutics, 42# Baiziting street, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China.
Yan Chen *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Women and Children's Healthcare Hospital, 123 Tianfei Xiang, Mochou Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210004, China.
Qian ZhaoDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of innovative Cancer Diagnosis & Therapeutics, 42# Baiziting street, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China.
Xianzhong ChengDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of innovative Cancer Diagnosis & Therapeutics, 42# Baiziting street, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China.
Xuening WangDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of innovative Cancer Diagnosis & Therapeutics, 42# Baiziting street, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China.
Xia XuDepartment of Chemotherapy, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 42# Baiziting street, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China.
Wenwen GuoDepartment of Pathology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 121# Jiangjiayuan road, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210011, China.
Xiaoxiang ChenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of innovative Cancer Diagnosis & Therapeutics, 42# Baiziting street, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China. cxxxxcyd@gmail.com.
Jing NiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of innovative Cancer Diagnosis & Therapeutics, 42# Baiziting street, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210009, China. nijingwulin@126.com.

Funding

789 Outstanding Talent Program of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University 789ZYRC202080122Clinical Science and Technology Climbing Program-"Spark"Basic Research Project, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University ZJ202213Jiangsu Provincial Scientific Research and Health Project ZD2022005Jiangsu Provincial Scientific research and Health Project for Women and Children F202004National Natural Science Foundation of China 82302974Natural Science Foundation of Youth Fund Projects of Jiangsu Province BK20210976Qunfeng Project of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital DFXK202504Research Project of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital RCQY202402Yishan Research Project of Jiangsu Cancer Hospital YSPY202401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOvarian cancer is the deadliest gynecological malignancy. The advent of poly-adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has transformed the treatment paradigm for ovarian cancer, significantly improving survival outcomes. However, some patients inevitably experience disease recurrence during maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitor. Currently, there is no established definition for early recurrence with PARP inhibitor.

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed ovarian cancer patients who received first-line PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy between March 2020 and April 2024. The optimal cutoff point for early recurrence was calculated using the maximally selected rank statistic. The logistic regression was employed to evaluate risk factors for early recurrence. Targeted sequencing of 437 cancer-related genes was performed on 37 ovarian cancer samples.

resultsAmong the 174 enrolled patients, 59 (33.9%) experienced recurrence. The optimal cutoff point for defining early recurrence was 11.37 months (median progression-free survival [PFS], 9.0 vs. not reached [NR], P < 0.001). For clinical convenience, this cutoff point was defined as 12 months. High-risk predictors for early recurrence included receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, maximal cytoreductive surgery with residual disease, and not achieving complete response (CR) to chemotherapy. Patients with early recurrence exhibit frequent mutations in MTOR, SMARCB1 and ZNF217, and have a higher tumor mutational burden (TMB).

conclusionsAccording to the results of this study, the optimal cutoff point for defining early recurrence was 12 months. Identifying high-risk predictors for early recurrence can facilitate prognosis stratification and guide treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalOvarian NeoplasmsPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaintenance ChemotherapyMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsCutoff pointEarly recurrenceOvarian cancerPARP inhibitorResistance

Identifiers

PMID41664213
PMCPMC12983666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.