Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41664175›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

A machine learning model for accurate prediction of CMV end-organ disease.

Yeliz Çiçek, Gökhan Silahtaroğlu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yeliz ÇiçekDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Türkiye. yeliz.cicek@medipol.edu.tr.ORCID 0000-0002-4061-2322
Gökhan SilahtaroğluSchool of Business and Management Sciences, Istanbul Medipol University, Kavacık Campus, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-8863-8348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCytomegalovirus (CMV) End-Organ Disease (EOD) remains a significant complication in immunocompromised individuals, particularly transplant recipients and patients undergoing chemotherapy. Accurate prediction of CMV EOD is essential for timely intervention but remains challenging using traditional methods.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting CMV EOD using clinical and laboratory data from a diverse cohort of high-risk patients.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 227 adult patients with suspected CMV disease from January 2014 to December 2024. CMV EOD was confirmed by histopathologic examination or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on tissue specimens. Clinical and laboratory data were randomly partitioned into a training set (75%) and a test set (25%) using stratified sampling to preserve the EOD prevalence. Four machine learning algorithms-artificial neural networks (ANN), XGBoost, support vector machines (SVM), and a majority-voting ensemble combining these three-were developed. Model performance was evaluated on the test set by calculating area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, precision, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR).

resultsAmong the 227 patients, 21 (9.3%) were solid organ transplant recipients, 100 (44.0%) underwent hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, and 56 (24.7%) had a history of chemotherapy. Overall, 53 patients (23.3%) were diagnosed with CMV EOD. Independent predictors included low body mass index, elevated CMV PCR viral load, the presence of graft-versus-host disease, and thrombocytopenia. The ANN model achieved the highest sensitivity (67%) and AUROC (0.75), whereas XGBoost and SVM demonstrated superior precision and a diagnostic odds ratio of 22.0. The ensemble majority-voting classifier yielded the best overall performance, with the highest accuracy (90%) and precision of 100%, indicating robust identification of true positive cases.

conclusionML models-particularly ensemble-based approaches-demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy in identifying CMV EOD and may offer valuable support for early risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Integration of these tools into routine practice could improve outcomes through timely, individualized care strategies in vulnerable transplant populations.

Indexed as

Cytomegalovirus InfectionsMachine LearningAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesSupport Vector MachineArtificial intelligenceCytomegalovirus end-organ diseasesMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41664175
PMCPMC12983601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.