Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41664164›Full record

ReviewJournal of hematology & oncology2026

Implementing generative artificial intelligence in precision oncology: safety, governance, and significance.

Ryuji Hamamoto, Takafumi Koyama, Satoshi Takahashi, Tomohiro Yasuda, Kazuma Kobayashi, Yu Akagi, Nobuji Kouno, Kazuki Sudo, Makoto Hirata, Kuniko Sunami and 17 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors.

Ryuji HamamotoDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. rhamamot@ncc.go.jp.
Takafumi KoyamaDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Satoshi TakahashiDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Tomohiro YasudaDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kazuma KobayashiDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yu AkagiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Nobuji KounoDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kazuki SudoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Makoto HirataDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kuniko SunamiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Takashi KuboDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Hiroshi KatayamaClinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Atsuo TakashimaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Tomonori TaniguchiDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Hiromi MatsumotoDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Ryota ShibakiDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Ken AsadaDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Masaaki KomatsuDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Syuzo KanekoDivision of Medical AI Research and Development, National Cancer Center Research Institute, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Masayoshi YamadaEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Hidehito HorinouchiDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Katsuya TanakaIT Integrating and Support Center, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yasushi GotoDepartment of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Ken KatoDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Yutaka SaitoEndoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Kenichi NakamuraClinical Research Support Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Noboru YamamotoDepartment of Experimental Therapeutics, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.

Funding

Cabinet Office, Government of Japan BRIDGEMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology the MEXT subsidy for the Advanced Integrated Intelligence Platform
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paramount challenge in precision oncology lies in further improving quality of life and response rates for individual patients. Efforts toward these goals are steadily expanding the scope of clinical implementation, despite ongoing challenges such as standardization, cost-effectiveness, and data harmonization. Building upon this maturing foundation, generative AI-which has evolved dramatically in recent years-is particularly valuable at this stage of advancing efficiency and adoption as an auxiliary technology linking literature, guidelines, trial protocols, and patient data. Specifically, through mutation interpretation, trial eligibility matching, and tumor board support, it is expected to contribute to advancing standardization, improving cost-effectiveness, accelerating data harmonization, and further accelerating human-centered decision-making. Accordingly, this review surveys the development history of generative AI and its current healthcare applications, organizing its implementation potential for precision oncology along three axes: (1) generative AI-based interpretation of genetic mutations and estimation of their pathological significance; (2) generative AI-driven verification of clinical trial eligibility; and (3) multimodal foundation models for imaging and pathology that compute "tumor phenotypes" using real-world data, contributing to report drafting and molecular surrogate estimation. In response, we propose a strategy centered on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and human-in-the-loop (HITL) workflows, encompassing data preparation based on OMOP, mCODE, and FHIR; multicenter prospective evaluation; auditable logs and governance aligned with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) and the EU AI Act; and a synthetic data strategy including differential privacy. Ultimately, this approach validates value through real-world outcomes and charts a path toward "learning oncology," accelerating patient-centered decision-making and clinical trial development.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMedical OncologyNeoplasmsPrecision MedicineGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansGenerative artificial intelligenceLarge language modelPrecision oncologyRetrieval-augmented generationTransformerVision language model

Identifiers

PMID41664164
PMCPMC12896320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.