ReviewJournal of hematology & oncology2026
Implementing generative artificial intelligence in precision oncology: safety, governance, and significance.
Review in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI Agents for Multimodal Oncology Diagnosis: Toward Transparent and Traceable Clinical Decision Support.JMIR cancer · 2026Review
- Putting the I in AML: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Cells · 2026Review
- Fully Automated Biometric Parameter Measurement in Prenatal Ultrasound Screening for Total Anomalous Pulmonary Venous Connection.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Feasibility and Concordance of a Large Language Model (ChatGPT-5) as a Clinical Decision Support Tool in Gynecologic Oncology Tumor Boards: A Blinded, Multi-Observer Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Emerging Approaches in Breast Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategies.Oncology research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The paramount challenge in precision oncology lies in further improving quality of life and response rates for individual patients. Efforts toward these goals are steadily expanding the scope of clinical implementation, despite ongoing challenges such as standardization, cost-effectiveness, and data harmonization. Building upon this maturing foundation, generative AI-which has evolved dramatically in recent years-is particularly valuable at this stage of advancing efficiency and adoption as an auxiliary technology linking literature, guidelines, trial protocols, and patient data. Specifically, through mutation interpretation, trial eligibility matching, and tumor board support, it is expected to contribute to advancing standardization, improving cost-effectiveness, accelerating data harmonization, and further accelerating human-centered decision-making. Accordingly, this review surveys the development history of generative AI and its current healthcare applications, organizing its implementation potential for precision oncology along three axes: (1) generative AI-based interpretation of genetic mutations and estimation of their pathological significance; (2) generative AI-driven verification of clinical trial eligibility; and (3) multimodal foundation models for imaging and pathology that compute "tumor phenotypes" using real-world data, contributing to report drafting and molecular surrogate estimation. In response, we propose a strategy centered on retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and human-in-the-loop (HITL) workflows, encompassing data preparation based on OMOP, mCODE, and FHIR; multicenter prospective evaluation; auditable logs and governance aligned with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) and the EU AI Act; and a synthetic data strategy including differential privacy. Ultimately, this approach validates value through real-world outcomes and charts a path toward "learning oncology," accelerating patient-centered decision-making and clinical trial development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.