ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
Clinical value of a novel V-shaped annular suture under unilateral biportal endoscopy: a retrospective comparative study with the traditional I-shaped suture.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnnular tears after lumbar discectomy can lead to reherniation and poor long-term outcomes. Traditional I-shaped sutures often fail to achieve sufficient closure strength at the annular defect. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a novel V-shaped annular suture technique compared with the traditional I-shaped suture during unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar discectomy.
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on 50 patients who underwent single-level lumbar discectomy with annular repair between January 2022 and June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the suture method: the I-shaped suture group (n = 27) and the V-shaped suture group (n = 23). Operative parameters (suture time, intraoperative blood loss), postoperative pain (visual analogue scale, VAS), functional recovery (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), disc degeneration (Pfirrmann grade), complication rate, and recurrence rate were compared between groups. Statistical analyses were performed using independent-sample t tests or chi-square tests as appropriate.
resultsThe mean follow-up duration was 14.5 ± 3.2 months. By the final follow-up, the recurrence rate was 11.1% (3/27) in the I-shaped group, while no recurrence was observed in the V-shaped group during follow-up. Both groups showed significant improvement in postoperative VAS and ODI scores compared with preoperative values (P < 0.05), but no significant intergroup difference was found (P > 0.05). Pfirrmann grades significantly improved postoperatively in both groups (P < 0.05), with no difference between groups (P > 0.05). According to the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent-to-good rate was higher in the V-shaped group (78.3%) than in the I-shaped group (70.4%), though not statistically significant (P = 0.199). No severe complications were observed in either group.
conclusionsThe V-shaped annular suture provides improved closure stability and may reduce the risk of postoperative recurrence compared with the traditional I-shaped suture. Although technically more demanding, this technique is safe and effective, showing promising clinical applicability for lumbar annular repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.