ArticleBMC medical education2026
Incorporating virtual reality in undergraduate internal medicine education: a scoping review of current evidence and implementation strategies.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVirtual reality (VR) is increasingly recognized as a valuable tool in undergraduate medical education. It offers immersive, interactive environments that support experiential learning and skill development. However, its specific application in internal medicine education remains variably described. This scoping review aims to explore how VR is currently implemented in undergraduate internal medicine education, identify its educational outcomes, and highlight associated advantages, limitations, and gaps in literature.
methodsFollowing the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search of eight databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase. Studies were included if they addressed the use of VR in internal medicine education among undergraduate medical students. Data were extracted and analyzed thematically.
resultsOf 1343 records screened, 9 studies published between 2017 and 2024 met the inclusion criteria. Studies originated from diverse countries and employed immersive and non-immersive VR technologies. Applications included teaching clinical reasoning, procedural skills, and emergency management. VR was associated with improved student engagement, satisfaction, and knowledge retention. Key advantages included scalability, safety, and cost-effectiveness. Limitations included technical challenges, limited physical interaction, and high initial costs. Few studies assessed long-term outcomes or included diverse, low-resource settings.
conclusionVR is a promising adjunct to traditional internal medicine education, enhancing learner engagement and skill acquisition. However, its integration requires addressing technical barriers, ensuring faculty training, and expanding research to include diverse educational contexts and long-term effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.