Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41664083›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

C-prior-implementation of the MAINTAIN instrument for patients with spinal pain: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Martha Funabashi, Garron Ives, Katherine A Pohlman, Sheilah Hogg-Johnson, Murray Townsend, Luciana Macedo, Joyce Lee, Andreas Eklund

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05350254 (C-prior), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05350254 naunknown statusnot on this map

C-prior: Implementation of the MAINTAIN Instrument for Patients With Dysfunctional Spinal Pain - a Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCanadian Memorial Chiropractic CollegeRan2023 to 2025Enrolled220ConditionsLow Back Pain, Recurrent, Neck Pain, Back PainArmsChiropractic maintenance care, Standard chiropractic care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martha FunabashiDivision of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada. mfunabashi@cmcc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0292-8668
Garron IvesInsight Health and Chiropractic, Private Practice, South West Rocks, NSW, Australia.
Katherine A PohlmanResearch Center, Parker University, Dallas, TX, USA.
Sheilah Hogg-JohnsonDivision of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Murray TownsendMount Forest Chiropractic, Private Practice, Mount Forest, ON, Canada.
Luciana MacedoSchool of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Joyce LeeDivision of Research and Innovation, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Andreas EklundThe Institute of Environmental Medicine (IMM), KarolinskaInstitutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpinal pain is a highly prevalent condition affecting a large part of the population. Chiropractic maintenance care (MC) is a management strategy intended to prevent spinal pain recurrent episodes and deterioration by treating patients at pre-planned intervals. A previous study showed that patients identified as a dysfunctional subgroup by the West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI) and receiving MC had fewer days with bothersome LBP. This suggests MC may have superior effectiveness in this subgroup of patients. The MPI, however, is not practical for daily clinical practice, prompting the development of the MAINTAIN instrument. This study aims to (1) assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stratified MC using the MAINTAIN instrument, and (2) assess the fidelity and procedure compliance of implementing the MAINTAIN instrument.

methodsThis pragmatic randomized clinical trial will recruit 225 consecutive patients (18-65 years old) with significant (> 30 days in the past 12 months) recurrent spinal pain presenting to chiropractic clinics. After the initial 3 weeks (6 visits) of chiropractic care, patients will be randomized to receive either Stratified MC or Standard Chiropractic Care. Stratified MC: patients will complete the MAINTAIN instrument and be stratified to MC or symptom-guided care (clinicians' judgment). Patients in the Standard Chiropractic Care arm will receive standard treatment based on the chiropractor's judgment. The primary outcome is the total number of days with activity-limiting pain measured at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include the number of missed working days and loss of work productivity due to pain, pain intensity, disability, health-related quality of life, perceived improvement, and implementation of MAINTAIN instrument outcomes. An intention-to-treat protocol and generalized estimating equations (GEE) linear regression models will be used for analysis. DISCUSSION: This study investigates the impact of using a clinical instrument to identify patients with recurrent spinal pain to target those who benefit most from a chiropractic MC approach. Strict inclusion criteria should ensure a suitable target group, and frequently collected repeated measures should provide accurate outcome assessment. The study is pragmatic and includes standard clinical procedures facilitating the generalizability and transferability of the results into clinical practice.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05350254. Prospectively registered on April 22, 2022, last modified on December 08, 2023. The first patient was randomized into the study on December 21, 2023.

Indexed as

Low Back PainManipulation, ChiropracticAdolescentAdultAgedCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRecurrenceTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultChiropracticLow back painMaintenance careManual therapyNeck painPreventionRandomized clinical trialSpinal pain

Identifiers

PMID41664083
PMCPMC12990656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.