ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Predicting suicidal and self-harm ideation using ecological momentary assessment: deep learning analysis in a general population sample.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSuicidal and self-harm ideation are major risk factors for suicide but are often difficult to detect, particularly in non-clinical populations. Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) offers a real-time, low-burden method for monitoring psychological states, yet its predictive value outside clinical settings remains unclear.
objectiveTo evaluate whether brief, indirect daily EMA data collected via a smartphone app can predict suicidal and self-harm ideation two weeks later in a general population sample.
methodsA total of 499 adults in Korea completed 28 days of EMA using the BIG4 + app, reporting on seven daily items related to mood, sleep, appetite, concentration, fatigue, and loneliness. Suicidal and self-harm ideation were assessed using the CESD-R at baseline, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks. A recurrent neural network with Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) architecture was trained on two-week EMA sequences, using 10-fold cross-validation.
resultsThe combined model using EMA and baseline data achieved an AUC of 0.873 for suicidal ideation and 0.821 for self-harm ideation. Predictive accuracy exceeded an AUC of 0.75 by day 6. Participants with ideation consistently showed lower scores on all EMA items. The study achieved a 94% compliance rate.
conclusionsBrief, indirect EMA data can predict near-term suicidal and self-harm ideation in a general population. These findings support the feasibility of smartphone-based EMA as a scalable and non-intrusive tool for early detection of suicide risk. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER : Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.