ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Therapists and ward staff experiences of virtual reality-assisted aggression treatment in a maximum-security forensic psychiatric clinic.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVirtual reality (VR) technology is increasingly being explored as a tool to help reduce aggressive behavior in forensic psychiatric settings. This study aimed to explore the experiences of therapists and ward staff participating in a pilot study of a VR-assisted aggression treatment within a Swedish maximum-security forensic psychiatric clinic.
methodsA qualitative, descriptive, and exploratory design was employed. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with five therapists and seven ward staff members who participated in the pilot of the newly revised Virtual Reality Aggression Prevention Training (VRAPT). The data, consisting of pre-transcribed interviews, were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis, carried out separately for each professional group.
resultsThe analysis resulted in eight overarching themes. Among therapists, five themes were identified: (1) Navigating treatment in the context of low patient motivation; (2) The perceived value of role-play in VRAPT; (3) Observed patient progress; (4) Structural and procedural barriers to implementation; and (5) Suggestions for future development. Among ward staff, three themes emerged: (1) Perspectives on patient behavior in forensic psychiatry; (2) Experiences of VRAPT in practice; and (3) Perceived opportunities provided by the intervention.
conclusionsParticipants described VRAPT as a promising and engaging method, highlighting its role-play as a particular strength. Nonetheless, technical challenges and contextual limitations were also noted. The study emphasizes the importance of individualizing the intervention to better address patient needs and enhance engagement, therapeutic motivation, and treatment outcomes. By integrating the perspectives of both therapists and ward staff, the findings provide valuable insights into the clinical application of VR-assisted interventions in forensic psychiatric settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.