ArticleBMC primary care2026
Long-term beta blocker prescribing after myocardial infarction in European primary care (PRACTITIONER).
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
27 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe long-term use of beta blockers after myocardial infarction in patients with preserved ventricular function is debated. General practitioners (GPs) often decide whether to continue or discontinue long-term medications, yet little is known about how they apply evolving evidence to clinical prescribing decisions.
objectiveTo assess whether GPs are willing to deprescribe beta blockers post myocardial infarction with preserved left ventricular function and to identify factors associated with deprescribing decisions.
designCross-sectional online survey using case vignettes, conducted between July 2023 and October 2024 in primary care settings in 24 sites across 20 European countries.
participantsPracticing GPs recruited through convenience sampling at each site. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was whether the GP chose to deprescribe beta blockers in the vignettes. Adjusted risk ratios for the association between GP characteristics and the decision to deprescribe were estimated using Poisson regression with generalized estimating equations and robust standard errors, accounting for clustering at the GP and country level. KEY
results604 GPs participated in the survey (median [IQR] age, 44.0 [35.0-54.8] years; 364 [60.3%] female), 89.2% deprescribed beta blockers in at least one vignette. The likelihood of deprescribing increased with time since myocardial infarction (adjusted risk ratio [RR] = 1.28; 95% CI 1.21–1.36 after 5 years; RR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.66–1.90 after 10 years vs. 3 months) and with side effects (RR = 1.76; 95% CI 1.66–1.88). More years of clinical experience were associated with a lower likelihood of deprescribing (RR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.77–0.95 for most vs. least experienced).
conclusionsIn this cross-national vignette study, most GPs were willing to deprescribe beta blockers after myocardial infarction in patients with preserved left ventricular function, particularly when time had passed and side effects were present. These findings suggest that GPs are open to applying evolving evidence on beta blocker discontinuation in clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.