ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Rhizosphere bacterial characteristics reveal the invasive advantage of Sphagneticola trilobata compared to the greening grass Axonopus compressus.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBiological invasions pose a major threat to ecosystem stability, yet the role of rhizosphere microbiomes in conferring competitive advantages to invasive plants remains insufficiently understood. In particular, whether invasive plants outperform resident or naturalized species by assembling distinct and functionally advantageous bacterial communities is still unclear. We hypothesized that the invasive plant Sphagneticola trilobata gains a competitive advantage by selectively recruiting beneficial rhizosphere bacteria, whereas the long-naturalized greening grass Axonopus compressus may experience negative soil legacy effects.
resultBased on 16 S rRNA gene sequencing across 15 paired field sites, we found that S. trilobata assembled a significantly more diverse, even, and structurally distinct rhizosphere bacterial community than A. compressus. The rhizosphere of S. trilobata was enriched with key bacterial taxa, including Rhizobiales, Cytophagales, Pseudomonadaceae, Comamonadaceae, Streptomyces and Novosphingobium, which are associated with nitrogen cycling, organic matter degradation, plant growth promotion, and allelochemical detoxification. Co-occurrence network analysis showed that the S. trilobata rhizosphere exhibited a more complex microbial network with a higher proportion of positive correlations. Functional prediction suggested an increased potential for carbohydrate transport and metabolism in the rhizosphere of the invasive plant. In addition, inoculation with a synthetic community (SynCom) composed of bacterial strains predominantly detected in the rhizosphere of S. trilobata significantly increased plant biomass and root allocation under nutrient-limited conditions.
conclusionThese results demonstrate that S. trilobata actively engineers a specialized and functionally robust rhizosphere microbiome that directly enhances its growth and resource-use strategy. This host-mediated microbiome assembly provides a microbial mechanism underlying the competitive dominance and invasion success of S. trilobata, highlighting the critical role of belowground bacterial communities in plant invasion processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.