ArticleBMC microbiology2026
Metagenomic sequencing and binning reveal carbon cycling microorganisms and gene functions in park environments.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the midst of increasing global warming and accelerated urbanization, urban parks, serving as significant carbon sinks, are increasingly recognized for their role in mitigating the urban heat island effect. However, limited research investigating the urban park carbon cycle hinders our full understanding and effective use of their carbon sink potential. This study employed metagenomics sequencing and 16S rRNA gene sequencing to characterize the carbon cycle and its influencing factors within soil and water from collected from nine city parks. Notably, the abundance and alpha diversity of carbon cycle microbes and genes were higher in soil compared to water. Specifically, soil samples exhibited enrichment of carbon cycling genes involved primarily in polysaccharide metabolism, particularly those associated with starch and cellulose metabolism. Conversely, water samples, revealed a greater prevalence of genes associated with chitin metabolism. The most important factor affecting soil carbon cycling genes was bacterial community, followed by non-nutritional factors and nutrient factors, while heavy metals demonstrated no effect on soil carbon cycling genes. The most important factor affecting water carbon cycling genes was only bacterial community. The analysis yielded 381 high-quality metagenomic assembled genomes (MAGs) containing carbon cycling genes, with significant covariation observed between the pta and carbon cycling genes ackA and acyP, which encode cellulose degradation functions. These findings contribute to a better understanding of microbial carbon metabolism within urban parks and offer a foundation for effective carbon emission management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.