ArticleIntestinal research2026
Real-world effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in Korean patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Intestinal research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Upadacitinib in Asian inflammatory bowel disease practice: encouraging real-world efficacy.Intestinal research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsUpadacitinib, a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in clinical trials for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, real-world data from Asian populations remain limited.
methodsWe conducted a singlecenter retrospective study to evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib in Korean patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD). Adult patients who initiated upadacitinib between July 2021 and November 2024 were included. Symptom-based clinical activity was assessed using patient-reported outcomes at baseline and 6 months. Adverse events and surgical interventions were also documented.
resultsForty patients (28 CD, 12 UC) were analyzed. At 6 months, symptom-based clinical remission was achieved in 82.4% of CD and 81.8% of UC patients, with clinical response rates of 88.2% and 90.9%, respectively. No clinical or treatment-related factors were significantly associated with remission in univariate analyses. Adverse events occurred in 57.5% of patients, all grade 1, and no treatment discontinuations were required. Six patients with CD required surgery during treatment.
conclusionsUpadacitinib was effective and well tolerated over 6 months in Korean patients with moderate-to-severe IBD, including those with biologic-experienced patients. These findings support its use in routine clinical practice, while highlighting the need for prospective studies to confirm its long-term safety and efficacy in Asian populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.