Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41663891›Full record

ReviewAnimal models and experimental medicine2026

Differences in cynomolgus macaque populations used for infectious disease research.

Darcy Quist, Kimimuepigha Ebisine, Emma Kennedy, Stuart Dowall, Mike Dennis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal models and experimental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Darcy QuistUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Salisbury, UK.ORCID 0009-0004-8128-9674
Kimimuepigha EbisineUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Salisbury, UK.
Emma KennedyUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Salisbury, UK.
Stuart DowallUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Salisbury, UK.
Mike DennisUK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), Salisbury, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cynomolgus macaques, a species of Old World primate native to southeastern and eastern Asia and the island of Mauritius, are one of the most important nonhuman primate models for infectious disease. Although the closely related rhesus macaque is classified into subspecies based on geographic origin, no such subdivision exists for cynomolgus macaques, and they continue to be used interchangeably in infectious disease research, reducing the comparability of data produced from these studies. Research into the population genetics of cynomolgus macaques has found significant differences between macaques native to different areas, including their genetic diversity, with macaques from insular populations such as Mauritius and the Philippines exhibiting highly restricted heterozygosity compared to mainland populations native to Indonesia or Cambodia. In the context of infectious disease studies, research into pathogens, including Ebola virus, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis have found differences in study outcomes, survival times, and immune cell responses between different populations of macaques. This review provides an overview of the differences between cynomolgus macaque populations in the context of genetic diversity, and in response to infection, and highlights the need for clear reporting of geographic origin of primates used in research. This will improve data comparison between studies and help to further refine this important animal model.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesDisease Models, AnimalMacaca fascicularisAnimalsGenetics, PopulationGenetic Variationanimal modelscommunicable diseasesgenetic variationMacaca fascicularispopulation genetics

Identifiers

PMID41663891
PMCPMC13042635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.