Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41663890›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026

Advocacy in Public Health Curricula: Exploring Gaps and Identifying Strategies for Strengthening Teaching Public Health Advocacy.

Alexandra J Bhatti, Dannielle Post, Nathan Dawes, Sophia Lin, Katherine L Francis, Josephine Y Chau, Janaki Amin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Advocacy in Public Health Curricula: Exploring Gaps and Identifying Strategies for Strengthening Teaching Public Health Advocacy.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexandra J BhattiSchool of Health Sciences and Nursing, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1031-2206
Dannielle PostSchool of Public Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Nathan DawesCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, Division of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Douglas, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8585-611X
Sophia LinSchool of Health Science, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Katherine L FrancisSchool of Public Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Josephine Y ChauSchool of Health Sciences and Nursing, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6261-2545
Janaki AminSchool of Health Sciences and Nursing, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedDespite the critical role of advocacy in health promotion and public health practice, there is limited inclusion of this competency in public health curricula. This may leave graduates underprepared for advocacy work and contribute to a workforce ill-equipped to engage in advocacy efforts. This research explores reasons for the limited inclusion of advocacy education within Australian tertiary public health curricula and examines educators' perspectives on public health advocacy.

methodsThis study used a semi-structured exploratory approach. Fourteen individuals participated in two focus groups. The participants were attendees of a national public health educators teaching and learning forum. Data analysis involved reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsThe majority of participants were female (91%) and employed at universities in various academic roles across diverse fields of public health. Two primary themes were identified: perceptions of public health advocacy and teaching public health advocacy. Participants attributed the inconsistent inclusion of advocacy curricula to ambiguities in definition, conceptualisation, scope and interpretation and emphasised the need for explicit integration of advocacy within curricula. They reported lacking self-efficacy and discipline-specific knowledge in teaching this material and expressed uncertainty regarding effective pedagogical approaches for teaching advocacy. Participants proposed a comprehensive framework for advocacy practice could facilitate its understanding and instruction.

conclusionFindings highlight the need for consensus on public health advocacy core competencies and a structured framework to guide its definition and instruction. Additionally, there is a need for professional development, evidence of effective advocacy pedagogy, and the explicit integration of advocacy within public health curricula. SO WHAT?: Addressing these challenges is crucial for developing a public health workforce capable of skilled advocacy in order to effectively influence policy and improve population health outcomes. This study demonstrates the imperative to strengthen both the conceptual understanding of public health advocacy and the provision of advocacy training within tertiary public health education.

Indexed as

Consumer AdvocacyCurriculumEducation, Public Health ProfessionalPublic HealthAcademiaAustraliaFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PromotionHumansMaleadvocacyhealth promotionpublic healthpublic health competenciespublic health curriculapublic health educationpublic health workforce

Identifiers

PMID41663890
PMCPMC12886589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.