ArticleHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026
Advocacy in Public Health Curricula: Exploring Gaps and Identifying Strategies for Strengthening Teaching Public Health Advocacy.
Article in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advocacy in Public Health Curricula: Exploring Gaps and Identifying Strategies for Strengthening Teaching Public Health Advocacy.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
issue addressedDespite the critical role of advocacy in health promotion and public health practice, there is limited inclusion of this competency in public health curricula. This may leave graduates underprepared for advocacy work and contribute to a workforce ill-equipped to engage in advocacy efforts. This research explores reasons for the limited inclusion of advocacy education within Australian tertiary public health curricula and examines educators' perspectives on public health advocacy.
methodsThis study used a semi-structured exploratory approach. Fourteen individuals participated in two focus groups. The participants were attendees of a national public health educators teaching and learning forum. Data analysis involved reflexive thematic analysis.
resultsThe majority of participants were female (91%) and employed at universities in various academic roles across diverse fields of public health. Two primary themes were identified: perceptions of public health advocacy and teaching public health advocacy. Participants attributed the inconsistent inclusion of advocacy curricula to ambiguities in definition, conceptualisation, scope and interpretation and emphasised the need for explicit integration of advocacy within curricula. They reported lacking self-efficacy and discipline-specific knowledge in teaching this material and expressed uncertainty regarding effective pedagogical approaches for teaching advocacy. Participants proposed a comprehensive framework for advocacy practice could facilitate its understanding and instruction.
conclusionFindings highlight the need for consensus on public health advocacy core competencies and a structured framework to guide its definition and instruction. Additionally, there is a need for professional development, evidence of effective advocacy pedagogy, and the explicit integration of advocacy within public health curricula. SO WHAT?: Addressing these challenges is crucial for developing a public health workforce capable of skilled advocacy in order to effectively influence policy and improve population health outcomes. This study demonstrates the imperative to strengthen both the conceptual understanding of public health advocacy and the provision of advocacy training within tertiary public health education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.