Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41663852›Full record

ArticlePituitary2026

Individualized gamma knife radiosurgery prescription dosing for pituitary adenomas: development and internal validation of a feedforward neural network model.

Jheremy S Reyes, Vidhan K Dhol, Alexandros Bouras, Georgios Zenonos, L Dade Lunsford, Ajay Niranjan, Constantinos G Hadjipanayis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Predicting time to local failure after gamma knife radiosurgery for melanoma brain metastases using survival machine learning.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jheremy S ReyesCenter for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Vidhan K DholCenter for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alexandros BourasCenter for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Georgios ZenonosCenter for Skull Base Surgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
L Dade LunsfordCenter for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ajay NiranjanCenter for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Constantinos G HadjipanayisCenter for Image-Guided Neurosurgery, Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Pittsburgh, PA, USA. hadjipanayiscg2@upmc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is an established treatment for pituitary adenomas yet prescription dose selection is often guided by clinician experience. Data-driven models may help standardize dose selection using routinely available clinical and imaging features.

objectiveTo develop and internally validate a feedforward neural network (FNN) to predict GKRS prescription dose for pituitary adenomas.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 102 pituitary adenomas treated with GKRS at a single center. Model inputs included age at treatment, sex, race, pre-treatment Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), functional or secretory status, histology, prior tumor resection, prior stereotactic radiosurgery, tumor volume, and cavernous sinus invasion. The target outcome was GKRS prescription dose (Gy). Data were randomly split into training and test sets (80:20). Features were standardized and one-hot encoded. A multivariable FNN with two hidden layers was trained, and test performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination (R²). Permutation importance was used to assess predictor contribution.

resultsOn the test set, the FNN achieved an MAE of 1.61 Gy, RMSE of 2.31 Gy, and R² of 0.51. Age at treatment showed the greatest contribution (ΔMAE +0.89 Gy with permutation), followed by functional or secretory status, tumor volume, cavernous sinus invasion, and pre-treatment KPS. Demographic variables and biopsy-related factors had minimal impact.

conclusionsThis proof-of-concept FNN generated individualized GKRS prescription dose estimates for pituitary adenomaswith acceptable prediction error, supporting the feasibility of data-driven dose recommendation tools and motivating external validation in larger, multi-institutional cohorts.

Indexed as

AdenomaPituitary NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryAdultAgedFeedforward Neural NetworksFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesFeedforward neural networkGamma knife radiosurgeryMachine learningPituitary tumorsPrescription dose prediction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.